ADM vs. BG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Bunge Limited (BG).

Performance

ADM vs. BG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Bunge Limited (BG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ADM vs. BG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company	27.39%	18.24%	-27.52%	-20.42%	39.98%	37.33%	12.44%	17.10%	5.28%	-9.48%
BG Bunge Limited	43.61%	18.56%	-20.74%	3.79%	9.28%	46.77%	18.92%	11.77%	-17.99%	-4.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ADM : $35.18B BG : $24.80B
EPS ADM : $2.23 BG : $5.24
PE Ratio ADM : 32.64 BG : 24.27
PS Ratio ADM : 0.44 BG : 0.28
Total Revenue (TTM) ADM : $80.29B BG : $70.33B
Gross Profit (TTM) ADM : $5.03B BG : $3.41B
EBITDA (TTM) ADM : $2.41B BG : $2.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 27.39% return, which is significantly lower than BG's 43.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed BG with an annualized return of 10.37%, while BG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.

ADM

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 23.63%
• 1Y: 56.75%
• 3Y*: 0.24%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 10.37%

BG

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 43.61%
• 6M: 58.61%
• 1Y: 71.59%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 12.79%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ADM vs. BG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADM

ADM Risk / Return Rank: 90
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BG

BG Risk / Return Rank: 92
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADM vs. BG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Bunge Limited (BG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADM	BG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.21	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.25	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.39	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	4.65	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	12.74	-0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADM vs. BG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the BG Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADM and BG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADM	BG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	2.21	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.44	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.38	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.33	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between ADM and BG is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ADM vs. BG - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than BG's 2.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company	2.82%	3.55%	3.96%	2.49%	1.72%	2.19%	2.86%	3.02%	3.27%	3.19%	2.63%	3.05%
BG Bunge Limited	2.20%	3.12%	3.48%	2.55%	2.31%	2.76%	3.05%	3.48%	3.59%	2.62%	2.21%	2.11%

Drawdowns

ADM vs. BG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, smaller than the maximum BG drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and BG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADM	BG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.01%	-77.34%	+9.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.32%	-15.39%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.14%	-41.49%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.14%	-60.49%	+6.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.41%	-1.18%	-16.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-29.09%	+7.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.65%	5.62%	-0.97%

Volatility

ADM vs. BG - Volatility Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Bunge Limited (BG) at 9.35%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADM	BG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.85%	9.35%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.51%	21.25%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.31%	32.49%	-4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.92%	29.19%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.91%	30.86%	-3.95%

Financials

ADM vs. BG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Bunge Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.59B and revenue of 18.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.

BG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 23.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.3%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

BG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of -103.00M and revenue of 23.76B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 456.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

BG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 95.00M and revenue of 23.76B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.