ADM vs. CL
ADM (Archer-Daniels-Midland Company) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — ADM in Farm Products, CL in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, ADM returned 9.94%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for CL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ADM vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 41.55% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 9.94%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.
ADM
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 41.55%
- 6M
- 35.61%
- 1Y
- 59.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
ADM vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 41.55% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADM and CL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 1983 | 0.26 |
The correlation between ADM and CL shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ADM:
$38.84B
CL:
$72.02B
ADM:
$2.23
CL:
$2.58
ADM:
35.93
CL:
34.68
ADM:
0.48
CL:
3.48
ADM:
1.70
CL:
496.66
ADM:
$80.61B
CL:
$20.80B
ADM:
$4.70B
CL:
$12.49B
ADM:
$3.48B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADM vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
ADM
CL
ADM vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.01 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | -0.08 | +5.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.45 | -0.14 | +14.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADM vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.01% | -58.91% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -18.64% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.22% | -29.05% | -20.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.14% | -29.05% | -25.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.14% | -29.05% | -25.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.23% | -14.31% | +6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -11.24% | -10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 11.35% | -6.72% |
Volatility
ADM vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is 7.74%, while Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that ADM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 8.32% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.56% | 17.28% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.30% | 21.83% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.26% | 18.81% | +9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.96% | 19.75% | +7.21% |
Dividends
ADM vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than CL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.57% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
ADM vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADM vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADM and CL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to ADM (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs CL's -58.91%.
ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADM and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer