PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. XLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 9.87%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


ACWX

1D
3.41%
1M
1.94%
YTD
13.42%
6M
14.35%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.87%

XLY

1D
2.48%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-2.41%
6M
-2.84%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
13.42%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.41%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and XLY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.71

The correlation between ACWX and XLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWX vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWX
XLY

Financial Services

23.3%

-

Technology

22.4%
0.9%

Industrials

14.0%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
97.6%

Healthcare

6.7%

-

Basic Materials

6.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Communication Services

4.7%
1.3%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

ACWX
23.3%
XLY

-

Technology

ACWX
22.4%
XLY
0.9%

Industrials

ACWX
14.0%
XLY
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWX
7.3%
XLY
97.6%

Healthcare

ACWX
6.7%
XLY

-

Basic Materials

ACWX
6.7%
XLY

-

Consumer Defensive

ACWX
5.0%
XLY

-

Energy

ACWX
4.8%
XLY

-

Communication Services

ACWX
4.7%
XLY
1.3%

Utilities

ACWX
2.8%
XLY

-

Real Estate

ACWX
1.2%
XLY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWXXLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

0.62

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

1.89

+7.80

ACWX vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, roughly equal to the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and XLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXXLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-59.05%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-14.98%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-26.01%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-39.67%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-39.67%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-6.41%

+4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-9.55%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

4.86%

-1.88%

Volatility

ACWX vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 6.20%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXXLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

6.20%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

13.52%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

18.29%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

23.84%

-7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

22.08%

-4.65%

ACWX vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.49%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWX and XLY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to XLY (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs XLY's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.72% vs 9.87% for ACWX. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

ACWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.13% for XLY.

ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and XLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer