ACWX vs. XLY
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 9.87%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for XLY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
ACWX vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 9.87%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
XLY
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
ACWX vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.41% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and XLY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ACWX and XLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACWX vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
XLY
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ACWX
XLY
-
Technology
ACWX
XLY
Industrials
ACWX
XLY
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
XLY
Healthcare
ACWX
XLY
-
Basic Materials
ACWX
XLY
-
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
XLY
-
Energy
ACWX
XLY
-
Communication Services
ACWX
XLY
Utilities
ACWX
XLY
-
Real Estate
ACWX
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
XLY
ACWX vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWX | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.10 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 0.62 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 1.89 | +7.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, roughly equal to the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -59.05% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -14.98% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -26.01% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -39.67% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -39.67% | +4.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -6.41% | +4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -9.55% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 4.86% | -1.88% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 6.20%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 6.20% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 13.52% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 18.29% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 23.84% | -7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 22.08% | -4.65% |
ACWX vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWX and XLY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to XLY (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.72% vs 9.87% for ACWX. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
ACWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.13% for XLY.
ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer