ACU vs. CERS
ACU (Acme United Corporation) and CERS (Cerus Corporation) are both stocks. ACU operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while CERS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, ACU returned 12.56%/yr vs -11.51%/yr for CERS. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACU vs. CERS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 44.63% return, which is significantly higher than CERS's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has outperformed CERS with an annualized return of 12.56%, while CERS has yielded a comparatively lower -11.51% annualized return.
ACU
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 21.13%
- 6M
- 33.65%
- YTD
- 44.63%
- 1Y
- 45.86%
- 3Y*
- 24.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.36%
CERS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -31.96%
- 6M
- -7.33%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 69.29%
- 3Y*
- -4.00%
- 5Y*
- -19.06%
- 10Y*
- -11.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.07M | $1.21M | $1.02M | |
| $7.88M | $7.29M | $7.26M |
ACU vs. CERS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 44.63% | 9.67% | -11.61% | 100.21% | -33.82% | 13.48% | 29.39% | 71.41% | -37.83% | -6.95% |
CERS Cerus Corporation | 4.37% | 33.77% | -28.70% | -40.82% | -46.40% | -1.59% | 63.98% | -16.77% | 50.00% | -22.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU and CERS is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1997 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, ACU and CERS have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ACU:
$219.74M
CERS:
$433.28M
ACU:
$2.37
CERS:
-$0.03
ACU:
1.13
CERS:
1.83
ACU:
1.97K
CERS:
6.00
ACU:
$211.60M
CERS:
$227.78M
ACU:
$84.82M
CERS:
$121.55M
ACU:
$21.43M
CERS:
$2.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU vs. CERS — Risk / Return Rank
ACU
CERS
ACU vs. CERS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Cerus Corporation (CERS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACU | CERS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 1.82 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 4.54 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACU vs. CERS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -91.05%, smaller than the maximum CERS drawdown of -99.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and CERS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU | CERS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.05% | -99.28% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.05% | -38.32% | +18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.71% | -52.26% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.89% | -85.37% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.47% | -86.45% | +33.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -97.33% | +93.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.81% | -81.46% | +42.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 15.30% | -6.88% |
Volatility
ACU vs. CERS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Acme United Corporation (ACU) is 16.99%, while Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a volatility of 31.46%. This indicates that ACU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU | CERS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.99% | 31.46% | -14.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.98% | 59.83% | -34.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 79.19% | -44.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.04% | 70.86% | -29.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.58% | 63.81% | -21.23% |
Dividends
ACU vs. CERS - Dividend Comparison
ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while CERS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 1.11% | 1.54% | 1.61% | 1.31% | 2.47% | 1.54% | 1.59% | 2.02% | 3.09% | 1.79% | 1.56% | 2.07% |
CERS Cerus Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ACU vs. CERS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and Cerus Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACU vs. CERS - Profitability Comparison
ACU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.69M and revenue of 62.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
CERS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.53M and revenue of 57.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.
ACU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 6.83M and revenue of 62.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
CERS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cerus Corporation reported an operating income of -1.86M and revenue of 57.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.2%.
ACU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 5.05M and revenue of 62.72M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
CERS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a net income of -2.94M and revenue of 57.44M, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU and CERS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CERS has higher volatility (31.46%) compared to ACU (16.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACU dropped -91.05% vs CERS's -99.28%.
ACU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACU and CERS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer