PortfoliosLab logo
ARLP vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARLP and BTU is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ARLP vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARLP:

1.16

BTU:

-0.66

Sortino Ratio

ARLP:

1.64

BTU:

-0.75

Omega Ratio

ARLP:

1.22

BTU:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

ARLP:

2.24

BTU:

-0.44

Martin Ratio

ARLP:

5.34

BTU:

-1.03

Ulcer Index

ARLP:

5.95%

BTU:

32.34%

Daily Std Dev

ARLP:

26.73%

BTU:

51.63%

Max Drawdown

ARLP:

-90.52%

BTU:

-98.07%

Current Drawdown

ARLP:

-3.92%

BTU:

-64.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARLP:

$3.43B

BTU:

$1.79B

EPS

ARLP:

$2.13

BTU:

$2.78

PE Ratio

ARLP:

12.53

BTU:

5.29

PEG Ratio

ARLP:

-1.04

BTU:

0.00

PS Ratio

ARLP:

1.47

BTU:

0.43

PB Ratio

ARLP:

1.89

BTU:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARLP:

$2.34B

BTU:

$4.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARLP:

$1.39B

BTU:

$715.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARLP:

$138.81B

BTU:

$902.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARLP achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -29.06% return.


ARLP

YTD

6.86%

1M

0.81%

6M

4.86%

1Y

30.22%

5Y*

67.07%

10Y*

8.49%

BTU

YTD

-29.06%

1M

15.15%

6M

-44.44%

1Y

-33.65%

5Y*

36.52%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARLP vs. BTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARLP is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARLP is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARLP vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ARLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARLP and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ARLP vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.49%, more than BTU's 2.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.49%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.55%8.86%19.74%5.75%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
2.04%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ARLP vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARLP drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLP and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ARLP vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) is 7.60%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that ARLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ARLP vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
540.47M
937.00M
(ARLP) Total Revenue
(BTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARLP vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Peabody Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
17.8%
(ARLP) Gross Margin
(BTU) Gross Margin
ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 540.47M and revenue of 540.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 166.80M and revenue of 937.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 94.28M and revenue of 540.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

BTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 31.90M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 73.98M and revenue of 540.47M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.

BTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 38.30M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.