PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ARLP vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ARLPBTU
YTD Return42.68%20.68%
1Y Return40.29%31.14%
3Y Return (Ann)47.68%34.36%
5Y Return (Ann)28.33%22.80%
Sharpe Ratio1.660.88
Sortino Ratio2.231.49
Omega Ratio1.301.17
Calmar Ratio1.930.59
Martin Ratio6.542.54
Ulcer Index6.16%11.92%
Daily Std Dev24.23%34.54%
Max Drawdown-90.52%-98.08%
Current Drawdown-0.30%-31.36%

Fundamentals


ARLPBTU
Market Cap$3.42B$3.75B
EPS$3.52$3.79
PE Ratio7.597.86
PEG Ratio-1.040.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.86T$4.27B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.86T$566.90M
EBITDA (TTM)$536.06B$866.30M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ARLP and BTU is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ARLP vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ARLP achieves a 42.68% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's 20.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
25.29%
31.68%
ARLP
BTU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARLP vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARLP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 6.54, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.54
BTU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.54

ARLP vs. BTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARLP and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.66
0.88
ARLP
BTU

Dividends

ARLP vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, more than BTU's 0.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.44%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.55%8.86%19.74%5.75%5.93%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
0.77%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ARLP vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARLP drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLP and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.30%
-31.36%
ARLP
BTU

Volatility

ARLP vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) is 4.40%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 14.24%. This indicates that ARLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.40%
14.24%
ARLP
BTU

Financials

ARLP vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items