ARLP vs. NRP
ARLP (Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.) and NRP (Natural Resource Partners L.P.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Thermal Coal industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, ARLP returned 14.87%/yr vs 28.73%/yr for NRP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARLP vs. NRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARLP achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than NRP's -2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ARLP has underperformed NRP with an annualized return of 14.87%, while NRP has yielded a comparatively higher 28.73% annualized return.
ARLP
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 41.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
NRP
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 32.07%
- 5Y*
- 44.57%
- 10Y*
- 28.73%
ARLP vs. NRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 10.30% | -2.45% | 39.91% | 18.83% | 73.34% | 195.75% | -56.80% | -28.90% | -1.90% | -4.04% |
NRP Natural Resource Partners L.P. | -2.37% | -1.93% | 27.43% | 87.03% | 72.85% | 164.73% | -25.28% | -43.26% | 55.86% | -14.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARLP and NRP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2002 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ARLP and NRP shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (10 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ARLP:
$72.64
NRP:
$9.53
ARLP:
0.34
NRP:
10.54
ARLP:
0.01
NRP:
0.67
ARLP:
0.01
NRP:
5.44
ARLP:
$517.67B
NRP:
$184.53M
ARLP:
$353.56M
NRP:
$128.91M
ARLP:
$82.91B
NRP:
$140.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARLP vs. NRP — Risk / Return Rank
ARLP
NRP
ARLP vs. NRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARLP | NRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.09 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.45 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | 1.34 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARLP vs. NRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARLP drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, smaller than the maximum NRP drawdown of -97.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLP and NRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARLP | NRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.52% | -97.11% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.63% | -19.45% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.83% | -19.45% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -25.24% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.26% | -78.75% | -6.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.77% | -19.29% | +5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.31% | -43.48% | +19.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.65% | 6.45% | +3.20% |
Volatility
ARLP vs. NRP - Volatility Comparison
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) at 6.75%. This indicates that ARLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARLP | NRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 6.75% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 15.33% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 20.10% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 34.72% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.20% | 41.87% | +8.33% |
Dividends
ARLP vs. NRP - Dividend Comparison
ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than NRP's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 9.83% | 11.19% | 10.65% | 13.22% | 7.38% | 3.16% | 8.93% | 19.82% | 11.94% | 9.54% | 8.85% | 19.74% |
NRP Natural Resource Partners L.P. | 3.10% | 4.03% | 4.90% | 5.87% | 4.97% | 5.39% | 9.82% | 13.18% | 4.71% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 45.28% |
Financials
ARLP vs. NRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Natural Resource Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARLP vs. NRP - Profitability Comparison
ARLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NRP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 39.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
NRP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 20.59M and revenue of 39.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.
ARLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
NRP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a net income of 392.00K and revenue of 39.35M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARLP and NRP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARLP has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to NRP (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLP dropped -90.52% vs NRP's -97.11%.
NRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARLP and NRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer