PortfoliosLab logo
AGO vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AGO and NVDA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AGO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGO:

0.44

NVDA:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

AGO:

0.92

NVDA:

0.84

Omega Ratio

AGO:

1.12

NVDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

AGO:

0.65

NVDA:

0.51

Martin Ratio

AGO:

2.24

NVDA:

1.24

Ulcer Index

AGO:

6.34%

NVDA:

15.09%

Daily Std Dev

AGO:

26.45%

NVDA:

58.96%

Max Drawdown

AGO:

-90.18%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

AGO:

-10.74%

NVDA:

-9.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGO:

$4.15B

NVDA:

$3.39T

EPS

AGO:

$8.42

NVDA:

$3.10

PE Ratio

AGO:

10.06

NVDA:

44.90

PEG Ratio

AGO:

2.52

NVDA:

1.93

PS Ratio

AGO:

4.70

NVDA:

22.86

PB Ratio

AGO:

0.74

NVDA:

41.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGO:

$956.00M

NVDA:

$148.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGO:

$826.00M

NVDA:

$104.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGO:

$385.00M

NVDA:

$90.97B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, AGO has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 13.45%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.01% annualized return.


AGO

YTD

-5.32%

1M

-3.24%

6M

-8.64%

1Y

11.56%

3Y*

14.76%

5Y*

29.02%

10Y*

13.45%

NVDA

YTD

0.63%

1M

24.06%

6M

-2.24%

1Y

22.32%

3Y*

93.53%

5Y*

72.51%

10Y*

74.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Assured Guaranty Ltd.

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGO vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGO is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGO is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGO is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGO is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGO is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGO is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGO and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AGO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
1.54%1.38%1.50%1.61%1.75%2.54%1.47%1.67%1.69%1.38%1.82%1.69%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

AGO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AGO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) is 5.27%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.81%. This indicates that AGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AGO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
345.00M
44.06B
(AGO) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
87.0%
60.5%
(AGO) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
AGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a gross profit of 300.00M and revenue of 345.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.67B and revenue of 44.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.5%.

AGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported an operating income of 176.00M and revenue of 345.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 21.64B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

AGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 345.00M, resulting in a net margin of 51.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 18.78B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.