PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGO vs. AMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGO vs. AMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a -13.93% return, which is significantly lower than AMR's -12.40% return.


AGO

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-13.93%
6M
-14.99%
1Y
-9.66%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.16%

AMR

1D
-5.75%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-12.40%
6M
-14.62%
1Y
63.62%
3Y*
2.13%
5Y*
51.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGO vs. AMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
-13.93%1.44%22.08%22.52%26.20%62.33%-33.94%30.12%14.95%-7.19%
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
-12.40%-0.12%-40.95%133.87%150.06%436.94%25.64%-86.23%10.71%-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AGO and AMR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between AGO and AMR has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

AGO:

$11.20

AMR:

-$3.00

PS Ratio

AGO:

2.99

AMR:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGO:

$951.00M

AMR:

$2.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGO:

$663.00M

AMR:

$31.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

AGO:

$500.00M

AMR:

$128.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGO vs. AMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGO
AGO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

AMR
AMR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGO vs. AMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGOAMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.20

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.83

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

3.95

-5.10

AGO vs. AMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the AMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGO and AMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGO vs. AMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, smaller than the maximum AMR drawdown of -97.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and AMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGOAMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.18%

-97.35%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.84%

-34.85%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-77.51%

+55.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.23%

-77.51%

+47.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.68%

-60.41%

+42.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.83%

-40.40%

+20.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

16.17%

-7.75%

Volatility

AGO vs. AMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) is 5.11%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a volatility of 22.06%. This indicates that AGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGOAMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

22.06%

-16.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.90%

39.81%

-22.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.60%

61.77%

-40.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.21%

59.65%

-32.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.98%

73.66%

-39.68%

Dividends

AGO vs. AMR - Dividend Comparison

AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
1.88%1.51%1.38%1.50%1.61%1.75%2.54%1.47%1.67%1.68%1.38%1.82%
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.57%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AGO vs. AMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
261.00M
524.99M
(AGO) Total Revenue
(AMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGO vs. AMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
AGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 261.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 524.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 261.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.59M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

AGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a net income of 88.00M and revenue of 261.00M, resulting in a net margin of 33.7%.

AMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -11.03M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGO and AMR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMR has higher volatility (22.06%) compared to AGO (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGO dropped -90.18% vs AMR's -97.35%.

AMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGO and AMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer