PortfoliosLab logo
AGO vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AGO and COST is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AGO vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGO:

0.50

COST:

1.41

Sortino Ratio

AGO:

0.86

COST:

1.99

Omega Ratio

AGO:

1.11

COST:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

AGO:

0.59

COST:

1.86

Martin Ratio

AGO:

2.13

COST:

5.38

Ulcer Index

AGO:

6.07%

COST:

5.96%

Daily Std Dev

AGO:

26.56%

COST:

21.98%

Max Drawdown

AGO:

-90.18%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

AGO:

-9.09%

COST:

-3.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGO:

$4.22B

COST:

$455.14B

EPS

AGO:

$8.42

COST:

$17.13

PE Ratio

AGO:

10.23

COST:

59.89

PEG Ratio

AGO:

2.52

COST:

5.43

PS Ratio

AGO:

4.77

COST:

1.72

PB Ratio

AGO:

0.76

COST:

17.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGO:

$956.00M

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGO:

$526.00M

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGO:

$129.00M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AGO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 13.65%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.97% annualized return.


AGO

YTD

-3.58%

1M

3.82%

6M

-5.30%

1Y

13.21%

3Y*

17.45%

5Y*

29.38%

10Y*

13.65%

COST

YTD

13.16%

1M

4.14%

6M

12.76%

1Y

30.65%

3Y*

37.33%

5Y*

29.80%

10Y*

23.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Assured Guaranty Ltd.

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGO vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGO is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGO is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGO is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGO is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGO and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AGO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than COST's 0.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
1.51%1.38%1.50%1.61%1.75%2.54%1.47%1.67%1.68%1.38%1.82%1.69%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.46%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

AGO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AGO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.89%. This indicates that AGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AGO vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
345.00M
63.72B
(AGO) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items