AGO vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGO or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between AGO and COST is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AGO vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AGO:
0.86
COST:
2.60
AGO:
1.51
COST:
3.20
AGO:
1.18
COST:
1.46
AGO:
1.01
COST:
4.72
AGO:
1.72
COST:
12.17
AGO:
12.75%
COST:
3.98%
AGO:
25.60%
COST:
18.66%
AGO:
-90.18%
COST:
-53.39%
AGO:
-7.38%
COST:
-4.08%
Fundamentals
AGO:
$4.53B
COST:
$435.99B
AGO:
$12.75
COST:
$16.98
AGO:
6.97
COST:
57.84
AGO:
2.52
COST:
5.99
AGO:
$917.00M
COST:
$258.81B
AGO:
$746.00M
COST:
$32.80B
AGO:
$838.00M
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 45.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AGO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.97%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.
AGO
18.55%
-3.88%
14.14%
20.68%
14.29%
14.97%
COST
45.38%
2.80%
12.78%
47.55%
28.68%
23.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AGO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than COST's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGO Assured Guaranty Ltd. | 1.06% | 1.50% | 1.61% | 1.75% | 2.54% | 1.47% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.38% | 1.82% | 1.69% | 1.70% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.04% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
AGO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that AGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AGO vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities