PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACCBX vs. NU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ACCBX and NU is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

ACCBX vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.67%
28.17%
ACCBX
NU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACCBX:

0.78

NU:

1.26

Sortino Ratio

ACCBX:

1.14

NU:

1.81

Omega Ratio

ACCBX:

1.14

NU:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

ACCBX:

0.27

NU:

1.43

Martin Ratio

ACCBX:

2.29

NU:

3.91

Ulcer Index

ACCBX:

1.88%

NU:

13.00%

Daily Std Dev

ACCBX:

5.47%

NU:

40.20%

Max Drawdown

ACCBX:

-25.13%

NU:

-72.07%

Current Drawdown

ACCBX:

-10.37%

NU:

-16.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 27.80% return.


ACCBX

YTD

0.32%

1M

0.49%

6M

-0.33%

1Y

3.86%

5Y*

-0.65%

10Y*

2.03%

NU

YTD

27.80%

1M

20.69%

6M

21.25%

1Y

41.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACCBX vs. NU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACCBX is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NU is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NU is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NU is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NU is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NU is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NU is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACCBX vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACCBX, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.781.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACCBX, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.141.81
The chart of Omega ratio for ACCBX, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.141.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACCBX, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.301.43
The chart of Martin ratio for ACCBX, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.293.91
ACCBX
NU

The current ACCBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCBX and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.78
1.26
ACCBX
NU

Dividends

ACCBX vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

ACCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACCBX
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund
4.61%5.05%4.53%3.88%2.84%3.08%3.66%4.16%3.57%3.67%3.91%3.96%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ACCBX vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCBX drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCBX and NU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.91%
-16.68%
ACCBX
NU

Volatility

ACCBX vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) is 1.47%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that ACCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.47%
11.08%
ACCBX
NU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab