ACCBX vs. AAAU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACCBX (Invesco Corporate Bond Fund) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both funds - ACCBX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Invesco, while AAAU is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Over the past 5 years, ACCBX returned 0.07%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for AAAU. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACCBX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.

Performance

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCBX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 2.94% return.

ACCBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 6.46%
• 3Y*: 5.28%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 2.96%

AAAU

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 32.29%
• 3Y*: 31.37%
• 5Y*: 18.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACCBX Invesco Corporate Bond Fund	0.62%	7.34%	2.87%	7.01%	-16.72%	0.31%	11.43%	15.78%	-1.93%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	2.94%	64.06%	26.91%	12.96%	-0.50%	-4.01%	25.02%	18.17%	9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ACCBX and AAAU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018	0.30

Return for Risk

ACCBX vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCBX

ACCBX Risk / Return Rank: 31
ACCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ACCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ACCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ACCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ACCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 32
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 36
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACCBX	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.23	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.63	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.25	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.70	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	4.21	+2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACCBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCBX and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACCBX	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	1.23	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	1.04	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.09	-0.57

Drawdowns

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCBX drawdown since its inception was -45.26%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCBX and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACCBX	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.26%	-21.63%	-23.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.46%	-19.13%	+15.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.72%	-19.13%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.59%	-20.94%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-17.68%	+14.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.86%	-6.18%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	7.69%	-6.69%

Volatility

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) is 1.43%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that ACCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACCBX	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	5.50%	-4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	22.94%	-19.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	26.33%	-22.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.28%	17.83%	-11.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.73%	16.99%	-11.26%

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACCBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACCBX vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

ACCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ACCBX Invesco Corporate Bond Fund	5.00%	4.95%	4.63%	3.78%	3.84%	4.91%	5.98%	3.67%	4.22%	4.13%	3.64%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACCBX and AAAU in my portfolio?

ACCBX and AAAU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACCBX or AAAU?

AAAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to ACCBX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCBX dropped -45.26% vs AAAU's -21.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.