PortfoliosLab logo
ACCBX vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ACCBX and NVDA is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

ACCBX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100,000.00%200,000.00%300,000.00%400,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
195.20%
312,054.26%
ACCBX
NVDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACCBX:

0.80

NVDA:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

ACCBX:

1.19

NVDA:

1.02

Omega Ratio

ACCBX:

1.14

NVDA:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

ACCBX:

0.33

NVDA:

0.74

Martin Ratio

ACCBX:

2.20

NVDA:

1.85

Ulcer Index

ACCBX:

1.98%

NVDA:

14.81%

Daily Std Dev

ACCBX:

5.47%

NVDA:

59.43%

Max Drawdown

ACCBX:

-23.59%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

ACCBX:

-8.57%

NVDA:

-21.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCBX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -12.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ACCBX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 2.72%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 72.94% annualized return.


ACCBX

YTD

0.28%

1M

0.49%

6M

-0.48%

1Y

4.35%

5Y*

1.30%

10Y*

2.72%

NVDA

YTD

-12.59%

1M

21.88%

6M

-21.15%

1Y

29.85%

5Y*

72.35%

10Y*

72.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACCBX vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACCBX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACCBX is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACCBX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACCBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCBX and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.80
0.51
ACCBX
NVDA

Dividends

ACCBX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ACCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than NVDA's 0.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACCBX
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund
4.67%5.05%4.53%3.88%2.84%3.08%3.66%4.16%3.57%3.67%3.91%3.96%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.03%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

ACCBX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCBX drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCBX and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.57%
-21.45%
ACCBX
NVDA

Volatility

ACCBX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) is 1.77%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 22.46%. This indicates that ACCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.77%
22.46%
ACCBX
NVDA