PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNY vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABNY vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABNY vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.69%-2.05%-9.41%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%-2.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a -5.69% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.


ABNY

1D
-0.51%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
-5.69%
6M
2.94%
1Y
0.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABNY vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABNY vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNY
ABNY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ABNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNY vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNYXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

1.02

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.23

1.40

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.20

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.47

-1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

3.35

-3.13

ABNY vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNY and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNYXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

1.02

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

0.55

-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between ABNY and XOMO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ABNY vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.89%, more than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM202520242023
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
55.89%53.45%22.09%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Drawdowns

ABNY vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNYXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.62%

-18.90%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-15.24%

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.70%

-5.12%

-15.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-7.05%

-9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.13%

6.69%

+2.44%

Volatility

ABNY vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.57%. This indicates that ABNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABNYXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

6.57%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

13.81%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.40%

22.02%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.82%

18.46%

+12.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.82%

18.46%

+12.36%