PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNY vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABNY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABNY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ABNY having a -5.21% return and QDTE slightly lower at -5.34%.


ABNY

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-5.21%
6M
4.40%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
2.12%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
-1.02%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABNY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABNY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNY
ABNY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ABNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNYQDTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

1.05

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

1.42

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.21

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.39

-1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.22

5.36

-5.14

ABNY vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNY and QDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNYQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

1.05

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.76

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between ABNY and QDTE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABNY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.60%, more than QDTE's 51.06% yield.


Drawdowns

ABNY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and QDTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNYQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.62%

-22.86%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-14.08%

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.29%

-8.29%

-12.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.44%

-3.30%

-13.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.11%

3.65%

+5.46%

Volatility

ABNY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 5.64%. This indicates that ABNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABNYQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

5.64%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.64%

12.02%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.40%

19.33%

+10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.85%

18.70%

+12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.85%

18.70%

+12.15%