ABNY vs. QDTE
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE).
ABNY and QDTE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABNY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. QDTE is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Mar 6, 2024.
Performance
ABNY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABNY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | -5.21% | -2.05% | -9.41% |
QDTE Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | -5.34% | 19.32% | 9.75% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ABNY having a -5.21% return and QDTE slightly lower at -5.34%.
ABNY
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABNY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABNY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
ABNY
QDTE
ABNY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABNY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 1.05 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | 1.42 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 1.39 | -1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 5.36 | -5.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABNY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 1.05 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 0.76 | -1.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNY and QDTE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ABNY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.60%, more than QDTE's 51.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 55.60% | 53.45% | 22.09% |
QDTE Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 51.06% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Drawdowns
ABNY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and QDTE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.62% | -22.86% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -14.08% | -3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.29% | -8.29% | -12.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.44% | -3.30% | -13.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.11% | 3.65% | +5.46% |
Volatility
ABNY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 5.64%. This indicates that ABNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABNY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 5.64% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.64% | 12.02% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.40% | 19.33% | +10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 18.70% | +12.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 18.70% | +12.15% |