ABNY vs. CONY
ABNY (YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ABNY returned 1.79% vs -42.39% for CONY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
ABNY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -25.27% return.
ABNY
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -16.66%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 6M
- -35.82%
- 1Y
- -42.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 1.19% | -2.05% | -9.41% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -25.27% | -26.34% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNY and CONY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024 | 0.42 |
The correlation between ABNY and CONY shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
ABNY
CONY
ABNY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.07 | -0.73 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.26 | -0.91 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.89 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.67 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | -1.13 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | -0.73 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.13 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
ABNY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.62% | -63.57% | +31.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -63.39% | +45.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.91% | -57.66% | +42.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -22.17% | +5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.00% | 37.68% | -28.68% |
Volatility
ABNY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) is 6.52%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that ABNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 15.87% | -9.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.21% | 43.66% | -24.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 58.29% | -33.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 60.06% | -29.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 60.06% | -29.88% |
ABNY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ABNY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
ABNY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.26%, less than CONY's 189.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 49.26% | 53.45% | 22.09% | 0.00% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 189.23% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNY and CONY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to ABNY (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs CONY's -63.57%.
On 1-year performance, ABNY leads with 1.79% vs -42.39% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, ABNY has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABNY has performed better with a 1.79% return vs -42.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABNY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 189.23%, compared with 49.26% for ABNY.
ABNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABNY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer