PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNY vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNY vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 83.68% return.


ABNY

1D
-2.10%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
1.29%
6M
12.23%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
4.85%
1M
27.24%
YTD
83.68%
6M
86.17%
1Y
151.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNY vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ABNY and CHPY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNY vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNY
ABNY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ABNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNY vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNYCHPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

5.54

-5.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.36

5.81

-5.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.81

-0.77

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

12.80

-12.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.59

48.97

-48.38

ABNY vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 5.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNY and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNYCHPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

5.54

-5.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

4.77

-4.95

Drawdowns

ABNY vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNYCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.62%

-12.17%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-12.17%

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.82%

0.00%

-14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-1.99%

-14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.99%

3.18%

+5.81%

Volatility

ABNY vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) is 6.70%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that ABNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNYCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

11.38%

-4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

22.33%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.86%

27.61%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.21%

33.22%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.21%

33.22%

-3.01%

ABNY vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ABNY and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

ABNY vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.21%, more than CHPY's 27.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
49.21%53.45%22.09%
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
27.65%28.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNY and CHPY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to ABNY (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs CHPY's -12.17%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 151.87% vs 3.60% for ABNY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, ABNY has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 151.87% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABNY and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

ABNY has the higher dividend yield at 49.21%, compared with 27.65% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.54 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNY and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer