PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNY vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 1.95% return.


ABNY

1D
-2.10%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
1.29%
6M
12.23%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
0.32%
1M
1.48%
YTD
1.95%
6M
3.26%
1Y
10.39%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
1.29%-2.05%-9.41%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
1.95%4.60%9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNY and XRMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNY
ABNY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ABNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNYXRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

1.94

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.36

2.71

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.38

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

2.03

-1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.59

8.26

-7.67

ABNY vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNY and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNYXRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

1.94

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.38

-0.56

Drawdowns

ABNY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNYXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.62%

-15.31%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-5.02%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.82%

0.00%

-14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-5.94%

-10.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.99%

1.23%

+7.76%

Volatility

ABNY vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 0.86%. This indicates that ABNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNYXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

0.86%

+5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

4.20%

+15.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.86%

5.39%

+19.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.21%

6.91%

+23.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.21%

6.91%

+23.30%

ABNY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABNY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.21%, more than XRMI's 12.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
49.21%53.45%22.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.59%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABNY has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to XRMI (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 10.39% vs 3.60% for ABNY. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 10.39% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ABNY.

ABNY has the higher dividend yield at 49.21%, compared with 12.59% for XRMI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ABNY and 0.60% for XRMI.

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNY and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer