ABNY vs. XRMI
ABNY (YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ABNY is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Over the past year, ABNY returned 3.60% vs 10.39% for XRMI. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABNY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
ABNY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 1.95% return.
ABNY
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 10.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 1.29% | -2.05% | -9.41% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.95% | 4.60% | 9.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNY and XRMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
ABNY
XRMI
ABNY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABNY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 1.94 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | 2.71 | -2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 2.03 | -1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 8.26 | -7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABNY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.94 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.38 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
ABNY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.62% | -15.31% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -5.02% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.82% | 0.00% | -14.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -5.94% | -10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.99% | 1.23% | +7.76% |
Volatility
ABNY vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 0.86%. This indicates that ABNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 0.86% | +5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 4.20% | +15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.86% | 5.39% | +19.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.21% | 6.91% | +23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.21% | 6.91% | +23.30% |
ABNY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
ABNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.21%, more than XRMI's 12.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 49.21% | 53.45% | 22.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.59% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABNY has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to XRMI (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs XRMI's -15.31%.
On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 10.39% vs 3.60% for ABNY. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 10.39% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ABNY.
ABNY has the higher dividend yield at 49.21%, compared with 12.59% for XRMI.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ABNY and 0.60% for XRMI.
XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABNY and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer