PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NBI vs. ACWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NBI vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NBI achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly lower than ACWX's 13.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NBI has underperformed ACWX with an annualized return of 7.53%, while ACWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


^NBI

1D
-0.34%
1M
-4.93%
6M
8.68%
YTD
12.69%
1Y
43.45%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
7.53%
ALL TIME*
11.18%

ACWX

1D
0.54%
1M
0.57%
6M
7.43%
YTD
13.98%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
9.29%
ALL TIME*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$159.02M$130.12M$131.76M

^NBI vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NBI
NASDAQ Biotechnology Index
12.69%32.40%-1.37%3.74%-10.91%-0.63%25.69%24.41%-9.32%21.06%
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
13.98%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NBI and ACWX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.57

The correlation between ^NBI and ACWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NBI vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

^NBI
^NBI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
^NBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
^NBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

^NBI vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NBIACWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

2.60

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.97

9.48

+5.49

^NBI vs. ACWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the ACWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NBI and ACWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NBI vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NBI drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than ACWX's maximum drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NBI and ACWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NBIACWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.70%

-60.40%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-11.42%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-13.84%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-29.78%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-35.38%

-3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-2.22%

-3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.47%

-13.24%

-13.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.12%

-0.21%

Volatility

^NBI vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NBIACWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.43%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

15.37%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

17.31%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.06%

16.62%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

17.28%

+6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NBI and ACWX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to ^NBI (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NBI dropped -74.70% vs ACWX's -60.40%.

^NBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NBI and ACWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer