PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NBI vs. GQETX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NBI vs. GQETX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NBI achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than GQETX's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NBI has underperformed GQETX with an annualized return of 9.20%, while GQETX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.19% annualized return.


^NBI

1D
1.52%
1M
6.58%
YTD
10.03%
6M
7.46%
1Y
47.36%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
9.20%

GQETX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
3.03%
6M
2.39%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
16.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NBI vs. GQETX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NBI
NASDAQ Biotechnology Index
10.03%32.40%-1.37%3.74%-10.91%-0.63%25.69%24.41%-9.32%21.06%
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
3.03%19.61%17.76%28.94%-15.33%31.67%18.33%31.77%0.50%29.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NBI and GQETX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.65

The correlation between ^NBI and GQETX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NBI vs. GQETX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NBI
^NBI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
^NBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
^NBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GQETX
GQETX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GQETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQETX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GQETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQETX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NBI vs. GQETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NBIGQETXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

1.46

+4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.94

5.76

+12.18

^NBI vs. GQETX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the GQETX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NBI and GQETX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NBI vs. GQETX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NBI drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than GQETX's maximum drawdown of -39.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NBI and GQETX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NBIGQETXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.70%

-39.99%

-34.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-12.76%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-15.54%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-24.22%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-30.44%

-8.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.88%

+2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.55%

-4.99%

-21.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.23%

-0.58%

Volatility

^NBI vs. GQETX - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) at 4.26%. This indicates that ^NBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NBIGQETXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

4.26%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

10.09%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.28%

12.69%

+7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

15.93%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

17.06%

+6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NBI and GQETX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^NBI has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to GQETX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NBI dropped -74.70% vs GQETX's -39.99%.

^NBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NBI and GQETX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer