PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NBI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NBI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^NBI vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NBI
NASDAQ Biotechnology Index
2.93%32.40%-1.37%3.74%-10.91%-0.63%25.69%24.41%-9.32%21.06%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NBI achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NBI has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.67%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


^NBI

1D
0.60%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
2.93%
6M
17.31%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
7.67%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NBI vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NBI
^NBI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
^NBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NBI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
^NBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NBI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^NBI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

0.92

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

1.41

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

1.41

+1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.88

6.61

+6.27

^NBI vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NBI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^NBI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.92

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.61

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.68

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.46

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ^NBI and ^GSPC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^NBI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NBI drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NBI and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^NBI^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.70%

-56.78%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-12.14%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-25.43%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-33.92%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-5.78%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.73%

-10.75%

-15.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.60%

+0.38%

Volatility

^NBI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ^NBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^NBI^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

5.37%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

9.55%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

18.33%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

16.90%

+4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

18.05%

+5.52%