PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NBI vs. XBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NBI vs. XBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NBI achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than XBI's 24.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NBI has underperformed XBI with an annualized return of 9.64%, while XBI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.


^NBI

1D
0.92%
1M
7.17%
YTD
11.04%
6M
8.45%
1Y
49.73%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
9.64%

XBI

1D
1.26%
1M
13.79%
YTD
24.45%
6M
20.14%
1Y
82.88%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
11.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NBI vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NBI
NASDAQ Biotechnology Index
11.04%32.40%-1.37%3.74%-10.91%-0.63%25.69%24.41%-9.32%21.06%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
24.45%35.89%1.01%7.60%-25.87%-20.45%48.33%32.56%-15.28%43.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NBI and XBI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006

0.92

The correlation between ^NBI and XBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NBI vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NBI
^NBI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
^NBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
^NBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NBI vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NBIXBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.48

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.91

8.57

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.83

25.32

-6.49

^NBI vs. XBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the XBI Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NBI and XBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NBI vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NBI drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than XBI's maximum drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NBI and XBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NBIXBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.70%

-63.89%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-9.72%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-32.99%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-54.71%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-63.89%

+25.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.30%

+12.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.54%

-20.93%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.28%

-0.63%

Volatility

^NBI vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (^NBI) is 7.01%, while SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that ^NBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NBIXBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

9.94%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

21.13%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

26.48%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

32.30%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

32.00%

-8.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ^NBI and XBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XBI has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to ^NBI (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NBI dropped -74.70% vs XBI's -63.89%.

XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NBI and XBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer