ZWS vs. LNN
ZWS (Zurn Water Solutions Corporation) and LNN (Lindsay Corporation) are both stocks. ZWS operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while LNN operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ZWS returned 27.77%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for LNN. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZWS vs. LNN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWS achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than LNN's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWS has outperformed LNN with an annualized return of 27.77%, while LNN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.42% annualized return.
ZWS
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 41.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 35.78%
- 10Y*
- 27.77%
LNN
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- -12.98%
- 3Y*
- -1.12%
- 5Y*
- -5.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
ZWS vs. LNN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 7.26% | 25.81% | 28.08% | 40.63% | -41.48% | 299.70% | 22.26% | 42.14% | -11.80% | 32.82% |
LNN Lindsay Corporation | -0.35% | 0.76% | -7.33% | -19.85% | 8.13% | 19.28% | 35.49% | 1.20% | 10.57% | 19.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWS and LNN is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012 | 0.48 |
The correlation between ZWS and LNN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ZWS:
$8.42B
LNN:
$1.24B
ZWS:
$1.25
LNN:
$5.48
ZWS:
39.58
LNN:
21.29
ZWS:
2.43
LNN:
1.26
ZWS:
4.85
LNN:
1.97
ZWS:
5.24
LNN:
2.44
ZWS:
$1.74B
LNN:
$636.56M
ZWS:
$760.20M
LNN:
$190.78M
ZWS:
$369.60M
LNN:
$87.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWS vs. LNN — Risk / Return Rank
ZWS
LNN
ZWS vs. LNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZWS | LNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.94 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | -0.43 | +2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | -0.76 | +7.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZWS vs. LNN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWS drawdown since its inception was -52.43%, smaller than the maximum LNN drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWS and LNN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWS | LNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.43% | -82.79% | +30.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -29.99% | +12.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.18% | -29.99% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.25% | -41.16% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.25% | -41.16% | -6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -33.03% | +27.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -28.80% | +12.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 17.15% | -11.28% |
Volatility
ZWS vs. LNN - Volatility Comparison
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Lindsay Corporation (LNN) at 5.89%. This indicates that ZWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWS | LNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 5.89% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.08% | 22.93% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.77% | 28.59% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.37% | 32.77% | +29.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.67% | 33.38% | +18.29% |
Dividends
ZWS vs. LNN - Dividend Comparison
ZWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than LNN's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNN Lindsay Corporation | 1.27% | 1.24% | 1.20% | 1.07% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.52% |
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 0.85% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 92.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZWS vs. LNN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Lindsay Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZWS vs. LNN - Profitability Comparison
ZWS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 205.80M and revenue of 433.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
LNN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a gross profit of 42.35M and revenue of 157.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
ZWS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
LNN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported an operating income of 13.01M and revenue of 157.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.
ZWS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 58.90M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
LNN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a net income of 12.05M and revenue of 157.72M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWS and LNN have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZWS has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to LNN (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZWS dropped -52.43% vs LNN's -82.79%.
ZWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZWS and LNN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer