PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNN vs. AGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNN vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 6.11%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.01% annualized return.


LNN

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.75%
YTD
-3.29%
6M
-3.85%
1Y
-17.65%
3Y*
-2.03%
5Y*
-6.59%
10Y*
6.11%

AGM

1D
-3.51%
1M
2.45%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.63%
1Y
-3.78%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
15.40%
10Y*
21.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNN vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
-3.29%0.76%-7.33%-19.85%8.13%19.28%35.49%1.20%10.57%19.89%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
0.57%-7.96%6.08%74.61%-5.83%72.62%-6.60%43.16%-20.38%39.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LNN and AGM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.30

The correlation between LNN and AGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LNN:

$5.48

AGM:

$24.06

PE Ratio

LNN:

20.66

AGM:

7.26

PEG Ratio

LNN:

1.22

AGM:

0.54

PS Ratio

LNN:

1.91

AGM:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNN:

$636.56M

AGM:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNN:

$190.78M

AGM:

$295.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

LNN:

$87.76M

AGM:

$192.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNN vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNN
LNN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNN Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNN Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AGM
AGM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNN vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNNAGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.01

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.12

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

-0.23

-0.85

LNN vs. AGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNN and AGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNNAGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

-0.12

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.52

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.61

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.32

-0.06

Drawdowns

LNN vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and AGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNNAGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.79%

-94.63%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.99%

-31.94%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.99%

-32.54%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.16%

-32.54%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-53.30%

+12.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.01%

-15.22%

-19.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-27.87%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

16.82%

-0.31%

Volatility

LNN vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is 7.33%, while Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that LNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNNAGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

9.34%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.07%

24.67%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.36%

31.97%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.85%

29.87%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.47%

34.50%

-1.03%

Dividends

LNN vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than AGM's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
3.49%3.42%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
1.31%1.24%1.20%1.07%0.82%0.86%0.99%1.29%1.27%1.34%1.53%1.52%

Financials

LNN vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
157.72M
415.96M
(LNN) Total Revenue
(AGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNN vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lindsay Corporation and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.9%
0
Portfolio components
LNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a gross profit of 42.35M and revenue of 157.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported an operating income of 13.01M and revenue of 157.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a net income of 12.05M and revenue of 157.72M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 51.83M and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNN and AGM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGM has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to LNN (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNN dropped -82.79% vs AGM's -94.63%.

AGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNN and AGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer