PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNN vs. AGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LNNAGM
YTD Return-2.83%11.17%
1Y Return0.37%27.82%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.92%20.31%
5Y Return (Ann)8.15%24.65%
10Y Return (Ann)5.27%25.04%
Sharpe Ratio0.010.92
Sortino Ratio0.291.41
Omega Ratio1.031.18
Calmar Ratio0.011.55
Martin Ratio0.043.29
Ulcer Index10.04%8.83%
Daily Std Dev34.20%31.70%
Max Drawdown-82.79%-94.63%
Current Drawdown-30.06%-2.71%

Fundamentals


LNNAGM
Market Cap$1.36B$2.25B
EPS$6.01$15.44
PE Ratio20.8913.74
PEG Ratio1.171.73
Total Revenue (TTM)$607.07M$600.51M
Gross Profit (TTM)$191.06M$600.51M
EBITDA (TTM)$101.05M$494.62M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LNN and AGM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LNN vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 5.27%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.04% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.77%
16.34%
LNN
AGM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNN vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNN, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNN, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNN, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNN, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNN, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.04
AGM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AGM, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AGM, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AGM, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AGM, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AGM, currently valued at 3.15, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.15

LNN vs. AGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNN and AGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.01
0.88
LNN
AGM

Dividends

LNN vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than AGM's 2.55% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
1.14%1.07%0.82%0.86%0.99%1.29%1.27%1.34%1.53%1.52%1.24%0.59%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
2.55%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%1.85%1.40%

Drawdowns

LNN vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and AGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-30.06%
-2.71%
LNN
AGM

Volatility

LNN vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

Lindsay Corporation (LNN) has a higher volatility of 14.71% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 12.88%. This indicates that LNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.71%
12.88%
LNN
AGM

Financials

LNN vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items