ZWS vs. BTU
Compare and contrast key facts about Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZWS or BTU.
Key characteristics
| ZWS | BTU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.42% | 17.24% |
| 1Y Return | 39.69% | 25.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.99% | 35.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.53% | 24.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.68 | 0.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.42 | 1.33 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.77 | 0.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.97 | 2.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.44% | 11.92% |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.77% | 34.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.31% | -98.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -37.27% | -33.32% |
Fundamentals
| ZWS | BTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.76B | $3.43B |
| EPS | $0.78 | $3.79 |
| PE Ratio | 51.05 | 7.45 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.01 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $4.27B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $657.50M | $566.90M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $244.60M | $866.30M |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWS and BTU is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ZWS vs. BTU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ZWS achieves a 36.42% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's 17.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZWS vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZWS vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison
ZWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, which matches BTU's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 0.80% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.74% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZWS vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWS drawdown since its inception was -69.31%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWS and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZWS vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) is 7.11%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that ZWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ZWS vs. BTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities