ZWS vs. BTU

In the year-to-date period, ZWS achieves a -8.99% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -39.64% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ZWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWS and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ZWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than BTU's 2.38% yield.

The maximum ZWS drawdown since its inception was -69.31%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWS and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) is 15.09%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 29.13%. This indicates that ZWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.