PortfoliosLab logo
ZWS vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZWS and BTU is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ZWS vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZWS:

0.62

BTU:

-0.84

Sortino Ratio

ZWS:

1.02

BTU:

-1.17

Omega Ratio

ZWS:

1.12

BTU:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

ZWS:

0.31

BTU:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

ZWS:

1.61

BTU:

-1.29

Ulcer Index

ZWS:

10.41%

BTU:

33.85%

Daily Std Dev

ZWS:

28.73%

BTU:

52.17%

Max Drawdown

ZWS:

-69.31%

BTU:

-98.07%

Current Drawdown

ZWS:

-42.58%

BTU:

-68.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZWS:

$6.09B

BTU:

$1.67B

EPS

ZWS:

$0.96

BTU:

$2.59

PE Ratio

ZWS:

37.70

BTU:

5.08

PEG Ratio

ZWS:

1.64

BTU:

0.00

PS Ratio

ZWS:

3.85

BTU:

0.40

PB Ratio

ZWS:

3.93

BTU:

0.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZWS:

$1.58B

BTU:

$4.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZWS:

$703.10M

BTU:

$715.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZWS:

$343.40M

BTU:

$901.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWS achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -36.53% return.


ZWS

YTD

-2.50%

1M

5.37%

6M

-8.67%

1Y

16.73%

3Y*

9.01%

5Y*

4.56%

10Y*

11.06%

BTU

YTD

-36.53%

1M

6.59%

6M

-44.27%

1Y

-46.03%

3Y*

-16.81%

5Y*

33.97%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Zurn Water Solutions Corporation

Peabody Energy Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZWS vs. BTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZWS is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZWS is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZWS is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZWS is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZWS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZWS is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZWS vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWS and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ZWS vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

ZWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BTU's 2.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
ZWS
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation
0.97%0.88%0.99%0.95%0.44%0.39%0.00%0.00%41.74%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
2.28%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZWS vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWS drawdown since its inception was -69.31%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWS and BTU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ZWS vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) is 9.00%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that ZWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZWS vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
388.80M
937.00M
(ZWS) Total Revenue
(BTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZWS vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
46.6%
17.8%
(ZWS) Gross Margin
(BTU) Gross Margin
ZWS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.00M and revenue of 388.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.

BTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 166.80M and revenue of 937.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

ZWS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 63.40M and revenue of 388.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

BTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 31.90M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

ZWS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 43.60M and revenue of 388.80M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.

BTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 34.40M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.