LNN vs. CCRN
LNN (Lindsay Corporation) and CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) are both stocks. LNN operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while CCRN operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LNN returned 6.42%/yr vs -0.27%/yr for CCRN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNN vs. CCRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than CCRN's 62.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has outperformed CCRN with an annualized return of 6.42%, while CCRN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.27% annualized return.
LNN
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- -12.98%
- 3Y*
- -1.12%
- 5Y*
- -5.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- 1Y
- -6.13%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
LNN vs. CCRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNN Lindsay Corporation | -0.35% | 0.76% | -7.33% | -19.85% | 8.13% | 19.28% | 35.49% | 1.20% | 10.57% | 19.89% |
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 62.59% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -42.55% | -18.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNN and CCRN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2001 | 0.30 |
The correlation between LNN and CCRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNN:
$1.24B
CCRN:
$414.46M
LNN:
$5.48
CCRN:
-$3.06
LNN:
1.97
CCRN:
0.56
LNN:
2.44
CCRN:
1.32
LNN:
$636.56M
CCRN:
$760.89M
LNN:
$190.78M
CCRN:
$138.12M
LNN:
$87.76M
CCRN:
$9.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNN vs. CCRN — Risk / Return Rank
LNN
CCRN
LNN vs. CCRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNN | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.13 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.24 | -0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNN vs. CCRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, smaller than the maximum CCRN drawdown of -90.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and CCRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNN | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.79% | -90.04% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.99% | -47.08% | +17.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.99% | -73.43% | +43.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.16% | -80.24% | +39.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | -80.24% | +39.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.03% | -66.11% | +33.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -64.46% | +35.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.15% | 25.26% | -8.11% |
Volatility
LNN vs. CCRN - Volatility Comparison
Lindsay Corporation (LNN) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) at 0.84%. This indicates that LNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNN | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 0.84% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.93% | 33.60% | -10.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.59% | 55.58% | -26.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.77% | 60.02% | -27.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 56.88% | -23.50% |
Dividends
LNN vs. CCRN - Dividend Comparison
LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while CCRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNN Lindsay Corporation | 1.27% | 1.24% | 1.20% | 1.07% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.52% |
Financials
LNN vs. CCRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LNN and CCRN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNN has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to CCRN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNN dropped -82.79% vs CCRN's -90.04%.
CCRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNN and CCRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer