LNN vs. ETN
LNN (Lindsay Corporation) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — LNN in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery, ETN in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, LNN returned 6.11%/yr vs 24.08%/yr for ETN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNN vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 33.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 6.11%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.08% annualized return.
LNN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -3.85%
- 1Y
- -17.65%
- 3Y*
- -2.03%
- 5Y*
- -6.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.11%
ETN
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 33.02%
- 6M
- 26.26%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.16%
- 10Y*
- 24.08%
LNN vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNN Lindsay Corporation | -3.29% | 0.76% | -7.33% | -19.85% | 8.13% | 19.28% | 35.49% | 1.20% | 10.57% | 19.89% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 33.02% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNN and ETN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.34 |
The correlation between LNN and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNN:
$1.20B
ETN:
$163.93B
LNN:
$5.48
ETN:
$10.22
LNN:
20.66
ETN:
41.19
LNN:
1.22
ETN:
2.24
LNN:
1.91
ETN:
5.76
LNN:
2.36
ETN:
8.29
LNN:
$636.56M
ETN:
$28.52B
LNN:
$190.78M
ETN:
$7.87B
LNN:
$87.76M
ETN:
$4.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNN vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
LNN
ETN
LNN vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LNN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.18 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.61 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 3.53 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 0.97 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.85 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.81 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.42 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
LNN vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.79% | -68.95% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.99% | -19.14% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.99% | -34.46% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.16% | -34.46% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | -44.55% | +3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.01% | -2.46% | -32.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -14.90% | -13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 8.75% | +7.76% |
Volatility
LNN vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is 7.33%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 12.77%. This indicates that LNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 12.77% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.07% | 25.11% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 32.08% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 29.93% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 29.96% | +3.51% |
Dividends
LNN vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than ETN's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.02% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
LNN Lindsay Corporation | 1.31% | 1.24% | 1.20% | 1.07% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.52% |
Financials
LNN vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNN vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
LNN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a gross profit of 42.35M and revenue of 157.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LNN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported an operating income of 13.01M and revenue of 157.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LNN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a net income of 12.05M and revenue of 157.72M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 866.00M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNN and ETN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (12.77%) compared to LNN (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNN dropped -82.79% vs ETN's -68.95%.
ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNN and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer