PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWS vs. AWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZWS vs. AWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWS achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than AWI's -19.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWS has outperformed AWI with an annualized return of 26.47%, while AWI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.89% annualized return.


ZWS

1D
-0.04%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
2.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
31.33%
3Y*
26.20%
5Y*
33.54%
10Y*
26.47%

AWI

1D
0.24%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
-19.50%
6M
-18.10%
1Y
-0.44%
3Y*
34.52%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWS vs. AWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZWS
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation
2.49%25.81%28.08%40.63%-41.48%299.70%22.26%42.14%-11.80%32.82%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
-19.50%36.23%45.05%45.37%-40.26%57.44%-19.97%62.79%-3.61%44.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWS and AWI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.49

The correlation between ZWS and AWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZWS:

$8.05B

AWI:

$6.62B

EPS

ZWS:

$1.25

AWI:

$7.04

PE Ratio

ZWS:

37.82

AWI:

21.76

PEG Ratio

ZWS:

2.32

AWI:

1.31

PS Ratio

ZWS:

4.64

AWI:

4.05

PB Ratio

ZWS:

5.01

AWI:

7.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZWS:

$1.74B

AWI:

$1.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZWS:

$760.20M

AWI:

$664.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZWS:

$369.60M

AWI:

$578.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWS vs. AWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWS
ZWS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ZWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AWI
AWI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWS vs. AWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWSAWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.02

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

-0.02

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

-0.04

+5.65

ZWS vs. AWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the AWI Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWS and AWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWSAWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

-0.02

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.32

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.50

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.30

+0.09

Drawdowns

ZWS vs. AWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWS drawdown since its inception was -52.43%, smaller than the maximum AWI drawdown of -80.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWS and AWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWSAWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.43%

-80.98%

+28.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.02%

-24.54%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-24.54%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.25%

-46.06%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.25%

-46.44%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.96%

-24.35%

+14.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-18.25%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

10.37%

-4.77%

Volatility

ZWS vs. AWI - Volatility Comparison

Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) at 7.32%. This indicates that ZWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWSAWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

7.32%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

20.10%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.36%

25.26%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.37%

26.15%

+36.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.66%

29.95%

+21.71%

Dividends

ZWS vs. AWI - Dividend Comparison

ZWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than AWI's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
0.86%0.66%0.81%1.06%1.38%0.74%1.09%0.77%0.30%
ZWS
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation
0.89%0.82%0.88%0.99%0.95%92.93%0.81%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZWS vs. AWI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Armstrong World Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M20222023202420252026
433.00M
409.90M
(ZWS) Total Revenue
(AWI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZWS vs. AWI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
47.5%
37.9%
Portfolio components
ZWS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 205.80M and revenue of 433.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.

AWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 155.30M and revenue of 409.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

ZWS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

AWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 94.20M and revenue of 409.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

ZWS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 58.90M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

AWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 66.80M and revenue of 409.90M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZWS and AWI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZWS has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to AWI (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZWS dropped -52.43% vs AWI's -80.98%.

ZWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWS and AWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer