ZWS vs. AWI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI).

Performance

ZWS vs. AWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZWS vs. AWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation	-3.34%	25.81%	28.08%	40.63%	-41.48%	92.51%	22.26%	42.14%	-11.80%	32.82%
AWI Armstrong World Industries, Inc.	-13.59%	36.23%	45.05%	45.37%	-40.26%	57.44%	-19.97%	62.79%	-3.61%	44.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ZWS : $7.64B AWI : $7.19B
EPS ZWS : $1.16 AWI : $7.07
PE Ratio ZWS : 38.55 AWI : 23.29
PEG Ratio ZWS : 2.37 AWI : 1.41
PS Ratio ZWS : 4.50 AWI : 4.44
PB Ratio ZWS : 4.76 AWI : 3.73
Total Revenue (TTM) ZWS : $1.70B AWI : $1.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZWS : $764.80M AWI : $658.70M
EBITDA (TTM) ZWS : $373.60M AWI : $613.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWS achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly higher than AWI's -13.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWS has outperformed AWI with an annualized return of 16.87%, while AWI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.95% annualized return.

ZWS

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -12.04%
• YTD: -3.34%
• 6M: -4.22%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 29.31%
• 5Y*: 15.21%
• 10Y*: 16.87%

AWI

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -4.82%
• YTD: -13.59%
• 6M: -15.61%
• 1Y: 17.85%
• 3Y*: 33.55%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZWS vs. AWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWS

ZWS Risk / Return Rank: 80
ZWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ZWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ZWS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ZWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ZWS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

AWI

AWI Risk / Return Rank: 62
AWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AWI Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AWI Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWS vs. AWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZWS	AWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.67	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	1.10	+0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.15	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	0.89	+1.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	2.63	+4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWS vs. AWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the AWI Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWS and AWI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZWS	AWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.67	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.52	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.46	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.32	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between ZWS and AWI is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZWS vs. AWI - Dividend Comparison

ZWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than AWI's 0.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation	0.89%	0.82%	0.88%	0.99%	0.95%	0.44%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%
AWI Armstrong World Industries, Inc.	0.79%	0.66%	0.81%	1.06%	1.38%	0.74%	1.09%	0.77%	0.30%

Drawdowns

ZWS vs. AWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWS drawdown since its inception was -52.43%, smaller than the maximum AWI drawdown of -80.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWS and AWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZWS	AWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.43%	-80.98%	+28.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.02%	-21.29%	+4.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.25%	-46.06%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.25%	-46.44%	-0.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.86%	-18.80%	+3.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-18.25%	+2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	7.22%	-2.02%

Volatility

ZWS vs. AWI - Volatility Comparison

Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) at 6.71%. This indicates that ZWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZWS	AWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.81%	6.71%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.73%	18.76%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.17%	26.64%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.85%	26.10%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.16%	30.19%	+4.97%

Financials

ZWS vs. AWI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zurn Water Solutions Corporation and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZWS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 180.80M and revenue of 407.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.4%.

AWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 154.50M and revenue of 388.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

ZWS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 64.60M and revenue of 407.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

AWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.40M and revenue of 388.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.7%.

ZWS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 42.10M and revenue of 407.20M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

AWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 65.50M and revenue of 388.30M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.