LNN vs. ALG
Compare and contrast key facts about Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LNN or ALG.
Key characteristics
| LNN | ALG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.83% | -7.67% |
| 1Y Return | 0.37% | 2.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.92% | 8.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.15% | 12.20% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.27% | 16.31% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.04 | 0.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.04% | 15.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.20% | 28.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.79% | -69.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -30.06% | -15.12% |
Fundamentals
| LNN | ALG | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.36B | $2.37B |
| EPS | $6.01 | $9.73 |
| PE Ratio | 20.89 | 19.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.17 | 3.89 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $607.07M | $1.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $191.06M | $417.45M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $101.05M | $214.21M |
Correlation
The correlation between LNN and ALG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LNN vs. ALG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly higher than ALG's -7.67% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed ALG with an annualized return of 5.27%, while ALG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LNN vs. ALG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LNN vs. ALG - Dividend Comparison
LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than ALG's 0.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNN Lindsay Corporation | 1.14% | 1.07% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.24% | 0.59% |
ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 0.54% | 0.42% | 0.51% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.61% | 0.58% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
LNN vs. ALG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than ALG's maximum drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and ALG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LNN vs. ALG - Volatility Comparison
Lindsay Corporation (LNN) has a higher volatility of 14.71% compared to Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) at 13.27%. This indicates that LNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LNN vs. ALG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Alamo Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities