LNN vs. ALG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG).

Performance

LNN vs. ALG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LNN vs. ALG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LNN Lindsay Corporation	1.30%	0.76%	-7.33%	-19.85%	8.13%	19.28%	35.49%	1.20%	10.57%	19.89%
ALG Alamo Group Inc.	-1.55%	-9.12%	-11.07%	49.19%	-3.27%	7.09%	10.41%	63.18%	-31.19%	49.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LNN : $1.27B ALG : $1.99B
EPS LNN : $6.76 ALG : $8.59
PE Ratio LNN : 17.60 ALG : 19.21
PEG Ratio LNN : 1.04 ALG : 2.28
PS Ratio LNN : 1.94 ALG : 1.24
PB Ratio LNN : 2.46 ALG : 1.73
Total Revenue (TTM) LNN : $665.91M ALG : $1.60B
Gross Profit (TTM) LNN : $210.92M ALG : $397.82M
EBITDA (TTM) LNN : $108.72M ALG : $248.37M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than ALG's -1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed ALG with an annualized return of 6.80%, while ALG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.

LNN

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -11.60%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: -14.77%
• 1Y: -4.82%
• 3Y*: -6.59%
• 5Y*: -5.62%
• 10Y*: 6.80%

ALG

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -22.74%
• YTD: -1.55%
• 6M: -13.29%
• 1Y: -6.82%
• 3Y*: -3.04%
• 5Y*: 1.48%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LNN vs. ALG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNN

LNN Risk / Return Rank: 32
LNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
LNN Omega Ratio Rank: 28
LNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LNN Martin Ratio Rank: 35

ALG

ALG Risk / Return Rank: 32
ALG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
ALG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ALG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ALG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ALG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNN vs. ALG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LNN	ALG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	-0.21	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	-0.06	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.99	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	-0.26	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	-0.49	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LNN vs. ALG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is comparable to the ALG Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNN and ALG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNN	ALG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	-0.21	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.05	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.38	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.26	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between LNN and ALG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LNN vs. ALG - Dividend Comparison

LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than ALG's 0.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LNN Lindsay Corporation	1.23%	1.24%	1.20%	1.07%	0.82%	0.86%	0.99%	1.29%	1.27%	1.34%	1.53%	1.52%
ALG Alamo Group Inc.	0.75%	0.71%	0.56%	0.42%	0.51%	0.38%	0.38%	0.38%	0.57%	0.35%	0.47%	0.61%

Drawdowns

LNN vs. ALG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than ALG's maximum drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and ALG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNN	ALG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.79%	-69.23%	-13.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.71%	-31.99%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.58%	-33.07%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.58%	-42.47%	+1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.92%	-28.78%	-3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.75%	-19.58%	-9.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.70%	16.81%	-4.11%

Volatility

LNN vs. ALG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is 8.31%, while Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a volatility of 19.03%. This indicates that LNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNN	ALG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	19.03%	-10.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.72%	25.65%	-5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.30%	33.17%	-5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.43%	29.15%	+3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.27%	31.14%	+2.13%

Financials

LNN vs. ALG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lindsay Corporation and Alamo Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a gross profit of 50.10M and revenue of 155.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

ALG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 85.00M and revenue of 373.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

LNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported an operating income of 19.61M and revenue of 155.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

ALG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 22.53M and revenue of 373.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

LNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lindsay Corporation reported a net income of 16.52M and revenue of 155.82M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

ALG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 15.51M and revenue of 373.65M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.