PortfoliosLab logo
LNN vs. ALG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNN and ALG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LNN vs. ALG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNN:

0.74

ALG:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

LNN:

1.38

ALG:

0.45

Omega Ratio

LNN:

1.17

ALG:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

LNN:

0.65

ALG:

0.14

Martin Ratio

LNN:

3.83

ALG:

0.45

Ulcer Index

LNN:

6.62%

ALG:

9.25%

Daily Std Dev

LNN:

34.32%

ALG:

31.00%

Max Drawdown

LNN:

-82.79%

ALG:

-69.22%

Current Drawdown

LNN:

-20.99%

ALG:

-12.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNN:

$1.51B

ALG:

$2.44B

EPS

LNN:

$7.04

ALG:

$9.61

PE Ratio

LNN:

19.80

ALG:

21.00

PEG Ratio

LNN:

1.17

ALG:

3.89

PS Ratio

LNN:

2.34

ALG:

1.53

PB Ratio

LNN:

2.96

ALG:

2.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNN:

$647.54M

ALG:

$1.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNN:

$204.65M

ALG:

$399.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

LNN:

$110.02M

ALG:

$220.47M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a 18.45% return, which is significantly higher than ALG's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed ALG with an annualized return of 6.91%, while ALG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.


LNN

YTD

18.45%

1M

8.29%

6M

5.55%

1Y

25.13%

3Y*

4.52%

5Y*

9.32%

10Y*

6.91%

ALG

YTD

6.89%

1M

18.60%

6M

-0.62%

1Y

5.08%

3Y*

19.63%

5Y*

14.48%

10Y*

14.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lindsay Corporation

Alamo Group Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNN vs. ALG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNN is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNN is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNN is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNN is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNN is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNN is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ALG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALG is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALG is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALG is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALG is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALG is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNN vs. ALG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the ALG Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNN and ALG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LNN vs. ALG - Dividend Comparison

LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than ALG's 0.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
1.03%1.20%1.07%0.82%0.86%0.99%1.29%1.27%1.34%1.53%1.52%1.24%
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
0.57%0.56%0.42%0.51%0.38%0.38%0.38%0.57%0.35%0.47%0.61%0.58%

Drawdowns

LNN vs. ALG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than ALG's maximum drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and ALG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LNN vs. ALG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is 6.03%, while Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that LNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LNN vs. ALG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Alamo Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
187.06M
390.95M
(LNN) Total Revenue
(ALG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNN vs. ALG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lindsay Corporation and Alamo Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
33.4%
26.3%
(LNN) Gross Margin
(ALG) Gross Margin
LNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lindsay Corporation reported a gross profit of 62.49M and revenue of 187.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

ALG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.84M and revenue of 390.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.

LNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lindsay Corporation reported an operating income of 32.12M and revenue of 187.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

ALG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 44.46M and revenue of 390.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

LNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lindsay Corporation reported a net income of 26.58M and revenue of 187.06M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

ALG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 31.80M and revenue of 390.95M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.