PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNN vs. ALG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNN and ALG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

LNN vs. ALG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,538.34%
2,239.22%
LNN
ALG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNN:

-0.14

ALG:

-0.28

Sortino Ratio

LNN:

0.03

ALG:

-0.22

Omega Ratio

LNN:

1.00

ALG:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

LNN:

-0.12

ALG:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

LNN:

-0.47

ALG:

-0.49

Ulcer Index

LNN:

10.03%

ALG:

16.50%

Daily Std Dev

LNN:

33.65%

ALG:

28.85%

Max Drawdown

LNN:

-82.79%

ALG:

-69.22%

Current Drawdown

LNN:

-30.87%

ALG:

-17.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNN:

$1.38B

ALG:

$2.37B

EPS

LNN:

$6.01

ALG:

$9.93

PE Ratio

LNN:

21.16

ALG:

19.79

PEG Ratio

LNN:

1.17

ALG:

3.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNN:

$445.72M

ALG:

$1.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNN:

$141.15M

ALG:

$417.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

LNN:

$70.37M

ALG:

$227.99M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNN achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than ALG's -9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LNN has underperformed ALG with an annualized return of 4.92%, while ALG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


LNN

YTD

-3.96%

1M

-4.25%

6M

8.08%

1Y

-5.52%

5Y*

6.18%

10Y*

4.92%

ALG

YTD

-9.90%

1M

-1.77%

6M

7.98%

1Y

-8.89%

5Y*

9.89%

10Y*

15.01%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNN vs. ALG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNN, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.14-0.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNN, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.03-0.22
The chart of Omega ratio for LNN, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.000.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNN, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.12-0.29
The chart of Martin ratio for LNN, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.47-0.49
LNN
ALG

The current LNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the ALG Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNN and ALG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.14
-0.28
LNN
ALG

Dividends

LNN vs. ALG - Dividend Comparison

LNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than ALG's 0.55% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
1.16%1.07%0.82%0.86%0.99%1.29%1.27%1.34%1.53%1.52%1.24%0.59%
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
0.55%0.42%0.51%0.38%0.38%0.38%0.57%0.35%0.47%0.61%0.58%0.46%

Drawdowns

LNN vs. ALG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNN drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than ALG's maximum drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNN and ALG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-30.87%
-17.17%
LNN
ALG

Volatility

LNN vs. ALG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is 6.27%, while Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that LNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.27%
6.79%
LNN
ALG

Financials

LNN vs. ALG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsay Corporation and Alamo Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab