PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTO vs. BILI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZTO vs. BILI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Bilibili Inc. (BILI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTO achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than BILI's -27.37% return.


ZTO

1D
1.42%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
11.03%
6M
8.18%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
-4.01%
10Y*

BILI

1D
-2.72%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
-27.37%
6M
-27.40%
1Y
-10.79%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
-30.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTO vs. BILI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
11.03%10.69%-3.76%-19.77%-3.84%-2.40%26.25%49.50%7.61%
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
-27.37%35.78%48.81%-48.63%-48.94%-45.87%360.37%27.62%48.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTO and BILI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.46

The correlation between ZTO and BILI shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZTO:

$18.23B

BILI:

$8.21B

EPS

ZTO:

CN¥11.28

BILI:

CN¥3.12

PE Ratio

ZTO:

13.71

BILI:

38.79

PS Ratio

ZTO:

2.45

BILI:

1.78

PB Ratio

ZTO:

1.99

BILI:

3.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥51.23B

BILI:

CN¥30.77B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥12.75B

BILI:

CN¥11.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥11.93B

BILI:

CN¥1.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTO vs. BILI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTO
ZTO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BILI
BILI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BILI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BILI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTO vs. BILI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Bilibili Inc. (BILI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTOBILIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.99

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.27

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

-0.60

+6.00

ZTO vs. BILI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the BILI Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTO and BILI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTO vs. BILI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum BILI drawdown of -94.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTO and BILI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOBILIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-94.30%

+37.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-52.06%

+36.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.55%

-53.12%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.55%

-92.97%

+43.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.79%

-88.58%

+55.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

-57.96%

+31.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

23.32%

-17.29%

Volatility

ZTO vs. BILI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) is 5.65%, while Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a volatility of 18.55%. This indicates that ZTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BILI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOBILIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

18.55%

-12.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

36.58%

-19.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.87%

49.74%

-23.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.52%

79.14%

-40.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.22%

73.93%

-35.71%

Dividends

ZTO vs. BILI - Dividend Comparison

ZTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
3.02%3.11%4.96%1.74%0.93%0.89%1.03%1.03%1.26%

Financials

ZTO vs. BILI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Bilibili Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
13.28B
7.43B
(ZTO) Total Revenue
(BILI) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

ZTO vs. BILI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Bilibili Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
24.4%
37.1%
Portfolio components
ZTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.24B and revenue of 13.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

BILI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 7.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

ZTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

BILI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported an operating income of 165.75M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

ZTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a net income of 2.12B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

BILI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a net income of 208.51M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZTO and BILI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILI has higher volatility (18.55%) compared to ZTO (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTO dropped -57.06% vs BILI's -94.30%.

ZTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTO and BILI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer