ZTO vs. ZWS
ZTO (ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.) and ZWS (Zurn Water Solutions Corporation) are both stocks. ZTO operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while ZWS operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, ZTO returned -3.37%/yr vs 35.78%/yr for ZWS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZTO vs. ZWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTO achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than ZWS's 7.26% return.
ZTO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 33.28%
- 3Y*
- -1.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
ZWS
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 41.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 35.78%
- 10Y*
- 27.77%
ZTO vs. ZWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 8.11% | 10.69% | -3.76% | -19.77% | -3.84% | -2.40% | 26.25% | 49.50% | 1.20% | 31.32% |
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 7.26% | 25.81% | 28.08% | 40.63% | -41.48% | 299.70% | 22.26% | 42.14% | -11.80% | 32.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTO and ZWS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2016 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
ZTO:
$17.75B
ZWS:
$8.42B
ZTO:
CN¥11.28
ZWS:
$1.25
ZTO:
13.34
ZWS:
39.58
ZTO:
0.70
ZWS:
2.43
ZTO:
2.38
ZWS:
4.85
ZTO:
1.93
ZWS:
5.24
ZTO:
CN¥51.23B
ZWS:
$1.74B
ZTO:
CN¥12.75B
ZWS:
$760.20M
ZTO:
CN¥11.93B
ZWS:
$369.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZTO vs. ZWS — Risk / Return Rank
ZTO
ZWS
ZTO vs. ZWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZTO | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.46 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | 7.11 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZTO vs. ZWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than ZWS's maximum drawdown of -52.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTO and ZWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTO | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -52.43% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -17.02% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.55% | -30.18% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.55% | -47.25% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.55% | -5.76% | -28.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -16.10% | -9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.31% | 5.87% | +0.44% |
Volatility
ZTO vs. ZWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) is 5.12%, while Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that ZTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZTO | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 7.73% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 22.08% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.74% | 29.77% | -4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.50% | 62.37% | -23.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.19% | 51.67% | -13.48% |
Dividends
ZTO vs. ZWS - Dividend Comparison
ZTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than ZWS's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 3.10% | 3.11% | 4.96% | 1.74% | 0.93% | 0.89% | 1.03% | 1.03% | 1.26% |
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 0.85% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 92.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZTO vs. ZWS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZTO vs. ZWS - Profitability Comparison
ZTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.24B and revenue of 13.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
ZWS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 205.80M and revenue of 433.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
ZTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.
ZWS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
ZTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a net income of 2.12B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
ZWS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 58.90M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZTO and ZWS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZWS has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to ZTO (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTO dropped -57.06% vs ZWS's -52.43%.
ZWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZTO and ZWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer