ZTO vs. ZWS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS).

Performance

ZTO vs. ZWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZTO vs. ZWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.	20.49%	10.69%	-3.76%	-19.77%	-3.84%	-2.40%	26.25%	49.50%	1.20%	31.32%
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation	-3.34%	25.81%	28.08%	40.63%	-41.48%	92.51%	22.26%	42.14%	-11.80%	32.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ZTO : $19.97B ZWS : $7.64B
EPS ZTO : $11.07 ZWS : $1.16
PE Ratio ZTO : 2.27 ZWS : 38.55
PEG Ratio ZTO : 0.12 ZWS : 2.37
PS Ratio ZTO : 0.42 ZWS : 4.50
PB Ratio ZTO : 0.30 ZWS : 4.76
Total Revenue (TTM) ZTO : $48.84B ZWS : $1.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZTO : $12.21B ZWS : $764.80M
EBITDA (TTM) ZTO : $11.82B ZWS : $373.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTO achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly higher than ZWS's -3.34% return.

ZTO

• 1D: 3.54%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 20.49%
• 6M: 31.09%
• 1Y: 31.42%
• 3Y*: -1.17%
• 5Y*: -1.31%
• 10Y*: —

ZWS

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -12.04%
• YTD: -3.34%
• 6M: -4.22%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 29.31%
• 5Y*: 15.21%
• 10Y*: 16.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZTO vs. ZWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTO

ZTO Risk / Return Rank: 73
ZTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ZTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ZTO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ZTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ZTO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ZWS

ZWS Risk / Return Rank: 80
ZWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ZWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ZWS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ZWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ZWS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTO vs. ZWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZTO	ZWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.24	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.09	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.26	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.19	-0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.91	7.17	-2.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZTO vs. ZWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the ZWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTO and ZWS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZTO	ZWS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.24	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.48	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.36	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ZTO and ZWS is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZTO vs. ZWS - Dividend Comparison

ZTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than ZWS's 0.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.	2.58%	3.11%	4.96%	1.74%	0.93%	0.89%	1.03%	1.03%	1.26%
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation	0.89%	0.82%	0.88%	0.99%	0.95%	0.44%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZTO vs. ZWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than ZWS's maximum drawdown of -52.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTO and ZWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTO	ZWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.06%	-52.43%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	-17.02%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.81%	-47.25%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.06%	-14.86%	-12.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.05%	-16.25%	-8.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.42%	5.20%	+1.22%

Volatility

ZTO vs. ZWS - Volatility Comparison

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) at 7.81%. This indicates that ZTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTO	ZWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.53%	7.81%	+3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.78%	17.73%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.30%	30.17%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.89%	31.85%	+7.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.41%	35.16%	+3.25%

Financials

ZTO vs. ZWS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.63B and revenue of 14.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

ZWS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 180.80M and revenue of 407.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.4%.

ZTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported an operating income of 3.00B and revenue of 14.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

ZWS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 64.60M and revenue of 407.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

ZTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a net income of 2.59B and revenue of 14.31B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.

ZWS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 42.10M and revenue of 407.20M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.