PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTO vs. GVH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZTO vs. GVH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (GVH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTO achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly higher than GVH's -30.56% return.


ZTO

1D
0.67%
1M
4.07%
6M
11.28%
YTD
16.82%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
-0.55%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.54%

GVH

1D
-1.96%
1M
-77.53%
6M
-17.36%
YTD
-30.56%
1Y
-80.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-91.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.99M$2.98M$2.64M
$43.37M$38.19M$40.10M

ZTO vs. GVH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
16.82%10.69%-3.76%-11.63%
GVH
Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
-30.56%-98.93%-57.47%-63.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTO and GVH is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZTO:

$19.03B

GVH:

$1.35M

EPS

ZTO:

CN¥11.38

GVH:

$0.59

PE Ratio

ZTO:

14.25

GVH:

1.71

PEG Ratio

ZTO:

0.75

GVH:

0.00

PS Ratio

ZTO:

2.55

GVH:

0.06

PB Ratio

ZTO:

2.08

GVH:

0.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥51.23B

GVH:

$27.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥12.75B

GVH:

$2.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥11.93B

GVH:

$1.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTO vs. GVH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZTO
ZTO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ZTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GVH
GVH Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVH Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZTO vs. GVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (GVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTOGVHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.00

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

-0.97

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

-1.64

+5.30

ZTO vs. GVH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the GVH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTO and GVH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTO vs. GVH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum GVH drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTO and GVH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOGVHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-99.89%

+42.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.77%

-84.80%

+69.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.28%

-99.88%

+70.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-86.45%

+60.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

50.06%

-42.96%

Volatility

ZTO vs. GVH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) is 4.55%, while Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (GVH) has a volatility of 124.71%. This indicates that ZTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOGVHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

124.71%

-120.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

167.94%

-151.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.18%

174.34%

-151.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.22%

159.22%

-121.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.01%

159.22%

-121.21%

Dividends

ZTO vs. GVH - Dividend Comparison

ZTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while GVH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GVH
Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
2.87%3.11%4.96%1.74%0.93%0.89%1.03%1.03%1.26%

Financials

ZTO vs. GVH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ZTO vs. GVH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ZTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.24B and revenue of 13.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

GVH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares reported a gross profit of 662.50K and revenue of 10.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.6%.

ZTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

GVH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares reported an operating income of -249.67K and revenue of 10.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.5%.

ZTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a net income of 2.12B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

GVH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globavend Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares reported a net income of -20.84K and revenue of 10.00M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZTO and GVH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVH has higher volatility (124.71%) compared to ZTO (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTO dropped -57.06% vs GVH's -99.89%.

ZTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTO and GVH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer