PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTO vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZTO vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTO achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 98.69% return.


ZTO

1D
1.05%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
8.11%
6M
6.13%
1Y
33.28%
3Y*
-1.01%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*

INSW

1D
4.64%
1M
12.03%
YTD
98.69%
6M
97.84%
1Y
148.32%
3Y*
49.17%
5Y*
50.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTO vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
8.11%10.69%-3.76%-19.77%-3.84%-2.40%26.25%49.50%1.20%31.32%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
98.69%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTO and INSW is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZTO:

$17.75B

INSW:

$4.40B

EPS

ZTO:

CN¥11.28

INSW:

$11.01

PE Ratio

ZTO:

13.34

INSW:

8.03

PEG Ratio

ZTO:

0.70

INSW:

1.27

PS Ratio

ZTO:

2.38

INSW:

6.49

PB Ratio

ZTO:

1.93

INSW:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥51.23B

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥12.75B

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZTO:

CN¥11.93B

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTO vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTO
ZTO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTO vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTOINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.54

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

9.23

-7.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

26.77

-21.48

ZTO vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 4.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTO and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTO vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, roughly equal to the maximum INSW drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTO and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-57.49%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-16.16%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.55%

-50.40%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.55%

-50.40%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.55%

0.00%

-34.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.03%

-20.85%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

5.63%

+0.68%

Volatility

ZTO vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) is 5.12%, while International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that ZTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

11.01%

-5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

28.32%

-11.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.74%

36.69%

-10.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.50%

41.12%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.19%

45.29%

-7.10%

Dividends

ZTO vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

ZTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than INSW's 9.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
9.42%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
3.10%3.11%4.96%1.74%0.93%0.89%1.03%1.03%1.26%

Financials

ZTO vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
13.28B
15.96M
(ZTO) Total Revenue
(INSW) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ZTO values in CNY, INSW values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTO and INSW have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to ZTO (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTO dropped -57.06% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTO and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer