ZS vs. MGK
ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) is a stock, while MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Over the past 5 years, ZS returned -9.02%/yr vs 14.87%/yr for MGK. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZS vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than MGK's 5.33% return.
ZS
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -19.58%
- YTD
- -42.42%
- 6M
- -45.18%
- 1Y
- -57.11%
- 3Y*
- -6.33%
- 5Y*
- -9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
ZS vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | -42.42% | 24.67% | -18.57% | 98.00% | -65.18% | 60.90% | 329.48% | 18.59% | 42.58% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZS and MGK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ZS and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZS vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
ZS
MGK
ZS vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZS | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.24 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.37 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 4.65 | -6.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZS vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZS | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.41% | -48.43% | -27.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.89% | -16.85% | -48.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.89% | -23.36% | -41.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.41% | -36.01% | -40.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.88% | -5.63% | -59.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -7.58% | -25.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.90% | 4.97% | +31.93% |
Volatility
ZS vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a higher volatility of 44.34% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that ZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZS | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.34% | 5.96% | +38.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.43% | 13.29% | +44.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.73% | 16.87% | +41.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.07% | 22.72% | +33.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.78% | 21.93% | +36.85% |
Dividends
ZS vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
ZS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZS and MGK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZS has higher volatility (44.34%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZS dropped -76.41% vs MGK's -48.43%.
MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZS and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer