PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZS vs. DDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZS vs. DDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Datadog, Inc. (DDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -40.26% return, which is significantly lower than DDOG's 84.08% return.


ZS

1D
-6.78%
1M
-5.51%
YTD
-40.26%
6M
-44.85%
1Y
-54.46%
3Y*
-1.91%
5Y*
-6.28%
10Y*

DDOG

1D
-6.99%
1M
70.65%
YTD
84.08%
6M
60.64%
1Y
110.96%
3Y*
36.34%
5Y*
23.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZS vs. DDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-40.26%24.67%-18.57%98.00%-65.18%60.90%329.48%-7.65%
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
84.08%-4.83%17.72%65.14%-58.73%80.93%160.56%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ZS and DDOG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.66

The correlation between ZS and DDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZS:

$21.60B

DDOG:

$91.30B

EPS

ZS:

-$0.49

DDOG:

$0.37

PS Ratio

ZS:

6.73

DDOG:

24.77

PB Ratio

ZS:

9.13

DDOG:

22.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZS:

$3.17B

DDOG:

$3.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZS:

$2.43B

DDOG:

$2.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZS:

$69.08M

DDOG:

$173.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZS vs. DDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DDOG
DDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZS vs. DDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Datadog, Inc. (DDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSDDOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

1.71

-2.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.23

2.81

-4.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.35

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.30

-3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.54

4.51

-6.04

ZS vs. DDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZS Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the DDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZS and DDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSDDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

1.71

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.40

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Drawdowns

ZS vs. DDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than DDOG's maximum drawdown of -68.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and DDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSDDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.41%

-68.11%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.89%

-48.62%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.89%

-48.62%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.41%

-68.11%

-8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.56%

-9.79%

-53.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.58%

-30.90%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.44%

24.72%

+10.72%

Volatility

ZS vs. DDOG - Volatility Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a higher volatility of 45.54% compared to Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) at 31.88%. This indicates that ZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSDDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.54%

31.88%

+13.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.23%

50.21%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.55%

65.33%

-6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.10%

58.22%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.45%

60.08%

-1.63%

Dividends

ZS vs. DDOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZS nor DDOG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ZS vs. DDOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zscaler, Inc. and Datadog, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
850.48M
1.01B
(ZS) Total Revenue
(DDOG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZS vs. DDOG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zscaler, Inc. and Datadog, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

76.0%77.0%78.0%79.0%80.0%81.0%82.0%20222023202420252026
77.4%
79.2%
Portfolio components
ZS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

DDOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a gross profit of 797.20M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.2%.

ZS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

DDOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

ZS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.

DDOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a net income of 52.57M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZS and DDOG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZS has higher volatility (45.54%) compared to DDOG (31.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZS dropped -76.41% vs DDOG's -68.11%.

DDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZS and DDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer