ZS vs. CRWD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).

Performance

ZS vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZS vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZS Zscaler, Inc.	-39.24%	24.67%	-18.57%	98.00%	-65.18%	60.90%	329.48%	-39.74%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-16.10%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ZS : $21.82B CRWD : $101.53B
EPS ZS : -$0.43 CRWD : -$0.73
PS Ratio ZS : 7.17 CRWD : 20.59
PB Ratio ZS : 9.94 CRWD : 22.93
Total Revenue (TTM) ZS : $3.00B CRWD : $4.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZS : $2.30B CRWD : $3.60B
EBITDA (TTM) ZS : $56.95M CRWD : -$39.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -39.24% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's -16.10% return.

ZS

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: -8.02%
• YTD: -39.24%
• 6M: -55.12%
• 1Y: -32.03%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: -4.91%
• 10Y*: —

CRWD

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: -16.10%
• 6M: -21.33%
• 1Y: 8.54%
• 3Y*: 42.04%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZS vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZS

ZS Risk / Return Rank: 16
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 47
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZS vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZS	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	0.19	-0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.79	0.60	-1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.08	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	0.31	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	0.79	-1.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZS vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZS Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZS and CRWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZS	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70	0.19	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.32	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.58	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between ZS and CRWD is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZS vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZS nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZS vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and CRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZS	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.41%	-67.69%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.40%	-37.18%	-23.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.41%	-67.69%	-8.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.94%	-29.45%	-33.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.98%	-23.93%	-8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.39%	14.60%	+11.79%

Volatility

ZS vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) have volatilities of 13.44% and 13.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZS	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.44%	13.42%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.35%	31.05%	+5.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.06%	45.39%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.26%	50.17%	+3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.01%	55.91%	+1.10%

Financials

ZS vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zscaler, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 624.49M and revenue of 815.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.

CRWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 989.46M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.

ZS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -51.77M and revenue of 815.75M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.4%.

CRWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.90M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

ZS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -34.31M and revenue of 815.75M, resulting in a net margin of -4.2%.

CRWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 38.69M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.