PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZS vs. ALAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZS vs. ALAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -43.90% return, which is significantly lower than ALAR's -1.52% return.


ZS

1D
1.70%
1M
-30.82%
YTD
-43.90%
6M
-44.98%
1Y
-59.36%
3Y*
-4.02%
5Y*
-10.49%
10Y*

ALAR

1D
0.48%
1M
8.54%
YTD
-1.52%
6M
9.31%
1Y
-33.83%
3Y*
52.98%
5Y*
-9.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZS vs. ALAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-43.90%24.67%-18.57%98.00%-65.18%60.90%329.48%18.59%7.16%
ALAR
Alarum Technologies Ltd.
-1.52%-19.13%36.73%223.33%-66.20%-50.00%-53.14%-94.90%-80.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ZS and ALAR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2018

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZS:

$20.28B

ALAR:

$50.11M

EPS

ZS:

-$0.49

ALAR:

$0.15

PS Ratio

ZS:

6.32

ALAR:

1.41

PB Ratio

ZS:

8.57

ALAR:

1.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZS:

$3.17B

ALAR:

$45.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZS:

$2.43B

ALAR:

$26.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZS:

$69.08M

ALAR:

$2.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZS vs. ALAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAR
ALAR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ALAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZS vs. ALAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSALARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.97

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.51

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

-0.80

-0.76

ZS vs. ALAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZS Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the ALAR Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZS and ALAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZS vs. ALAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, smaller than the maximum ALAR drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and ALAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSALARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.41%

-99.95%

+23.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.89%

-67.10%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.89%

-87.82%

+22.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.41%

-89.80%

+13.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.79%

-99.72%

+33.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-95.60%

+62.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.14%

42.29%

-4.15%

Volatility

ZS vs. ALAR - Volatility Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a higher volatility of 43.02% compared to Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) at 38.54%. This indicates that ZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSALARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.02%

38.54%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.36%

57.48%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.82%

78.13%

-19.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.10%

97.23%

-41.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.71%

104.77%

-46.06%

Dividends

ZS vs. ALAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZS nor ALAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ZS vs. ALAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zscaler, Inc. and Alarum Technologies Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
850.48M
11.71M
(ZS) Total Revenue
(ALAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZS vs. ALAR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zscaler, Inc. and Alarum Technologies Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.4%
61.7%
Portfolio components
ZS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

ALAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported a gross profit of 7.23M and revenue of 11.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

ZS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

ALAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported an operating income of 809.00K and revenue of 11.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

ZS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.

ALAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported a net income of 593.00K and revenue of 11.71M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZS and ALAR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZS has higher volatility (43.02%) compared to ALAR (38.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZS dropped -76.41% vs ALAR's -99.95%.

ALAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZS and ALAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer