ZIM vs. STIP
ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) is a stock, while STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Over the past 5 years, ZIM returned 20.68%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for STIP. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZIM vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 2.04% return.
ZIM
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 43.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.68%
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
ZIM vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 19.30% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.04% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and STIP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.01 |
The correlation between ZIM and STIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIM vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
ZIM
STIP
ZIM vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIM | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.69 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 6.76 | -4.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 26.37 | -22.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIM | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 3.23 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 1.23 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.07 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIM | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -5.50% | -79.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.66% | -0.69% | -29.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.12% | -0.95% | -56.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -5.50% | -79.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -0.03% | -14.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.05% | -0.99% | -39.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 0.18% | +12.47% |
Volatility
ZIM vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIM | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 0.40% | +14.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.41% | 0.99% | +36.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.01% | 1.46% | +51.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.89% | 2.75% | +63.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.72% | 2.45% | +65.27% |
Dividends
ZIM vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than STIP's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 5.10% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIM and STIP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIM dropped -84.68% vs STIP's -5.50%.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIM and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer