STIP vs. BND
STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, STIP returned 3.14%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for BND. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STIP charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
STIP vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, STIP has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 3.14%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.
STIP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.37%
BND
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- -0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $451.00M | $507.49M | $592.68M | |
| $80.85M | $78.77M | $101.18M |
STIP vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.81% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.68% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 0.54% | 0.74% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.54% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between STIP and BND is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2010 | 0.54 |
The correlation between STIP and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STIP vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
STIP
BND
STIP vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STIP | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.12 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 0.99 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.31 | 2.48 | +12.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STIP vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STIP | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -18.58% | +13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.73% | -2.68% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.95% | -4.81% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | -17.91% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.50% | -18.58% | +13.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -3.15% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -3.06% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 1.07% | -0.84% |
Volatility
STIP vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.38%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STIP | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.98% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.17% | 2.90% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52% | 3.70% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 6.03% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 5.53% | -3.08% |
STIP vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STIP vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.69% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STIP and BND have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to STIP (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STIP dropped -5.50% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 10-year performance, STIP leads with 3.14% vs 1.36% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, STIP has performed better with a 3.14% return vs 1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for STIP.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 3.69% for BND.
STIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. STIP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for STIP and 0.03% for BND.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STIP and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer