ZBH vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZBH (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, ZBH returned -2.46%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for LIT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZBH vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a -5.24% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 30.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of -2.46%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.81% annualized return.

ZBH

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: -5.24%
• 6M: -8.23%
• 1Y: -6.51%
• 3Y*: -12.39%
• 5Y*: -10.52%
• 10Y*: -2.46%

LIT

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: 34.89%
• 1Y: 135.24%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZBH vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	-5.24%	-14.03%	-12.46%	-3.81%	4.24%	-17.02%	3.77%	45.37%	-13.30%	17.86%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	30.84%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBH and LIT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2010	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between ZBH and LIT has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZBH vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBH

ZBH Risk / Return Rank: 30
ZBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
ZBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ZBH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ZBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ZBH Martin Ratio Rank: 31

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 94
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBH vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZBH	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	4.16	-4.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	4.45	-4.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.59	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	10.37	-10.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	35.19	-35.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZBH vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBH and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZBH	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	4.16	-4.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	0.16	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	0.48	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.27	-0.09

Drawdowns

ZBH vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, roughly equal to the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZBH	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.03%	-65.91%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.54%	-13.11%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.94%	-53.01%	+9.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.62%	-65.91%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.14%	-65.91%	+13.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.89%	-8.53%	-40.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-33.63%	+13.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.72%	3.86%	+8.86%

Volatility

ZBH vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) is 7.44%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that ZBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZBH	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.44%	8.67%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.09%	22.00%	-1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.38%	32.68%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.60%	31.83%	-5.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.43%	30.66%	-2.23%

Dividends

ZBH vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

ZBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than LIT's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.37%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	1.13%	1.07%	0.91%	0.79%	0.75%	0.76%	0.62%	0.64%	0.93%	0.80%	0.93%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZBH and LIT in my portfolio?

ZBH and LIT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZBH or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to ZBH (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBH dropped -65.03% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.