ZBH vs. SNN
Compare and contrast key facts about Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and Smith & Nephew plc (SNN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZBH or SNN.
Key characteristics
| ZBH | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -12.20% | 14.21% |
| 1Y Return | -8.91% | 24.07% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.70% | -2.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.32% | -6.27% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.49% | 1.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.49 | 0.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.12% | 23.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.03% | -55.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -37.02% | -33.48% |
Fundamentals
| ZBH | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.66B | $13.49B |
| EPS | $4.79 | $0.70 |
| PE Ratio | 22.20 | 44.21 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.41 | 0.47 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.52B | $5.62B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.98B | $3.88B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.36B | $1.48B |
Correlation
The correlation between ZBH and SNN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ZBH vs. SNN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a -12.20% return, which is significantly lower than SNN's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has outperformed SNN with an annualized return of 1.49%, while SNN has yielded a comparatively lower 1.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZBH vs. SNN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and Smith & Nephew plc (SNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZBH vs. SNN - Dividend Comparison
ZBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than SNN's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
SNN Smith & Nephew plc | 2.45% | 2.75% | 2.79% | 2.17% | 1.78% | 1.51% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 2.08% | 1.71% | 1.52% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
ZBH vs. SNN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, which is greater than SNN's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and SNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZBH vs. SNN - Volatility Comparison
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) at 3.69%. This indicates that ZBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ZBH vs. SNN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and Smith & Nephew plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities