PortfoliosLab logo
ZBH vs. LMAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZBH and LMAT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ZBH vs. LMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
56.38%
1,457.99%
ZBH
LMAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZBH:

-0.80

LMAT:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

ZBH:

-0.91

LMAT:

0.58

Omega Ratio

ZBH:

0.87

LMAT:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

ZBH:

-0.44

LMAT:

0.34

Martin Ratio

ZBH:

-1.79

LMAT:

0.86

Ulcer Index

ZBH:

11.43%

LMAT:

11.12%

Daily Std Dev

ZBH:

25.99%

LMAT:

34.59%

Max Drawdown

ZBH:

-65.03%

LMAT:

-75.69%

Current Drawdown

ZBH:

-43.34%

LMAT:

-24.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZBH:

$20.25B

LMAT:

$1.82B

EPS

ZBH:

$4.43

LMAT:

$1.97

PE Ratio

ZBH:

23.11

LMAT:

40.83

PEG Ratio

ZBH:

1.27

LMAT:

2.07

PS Ratio

ZBH:

2.66

LMAT:

8.03

PB Ratio

ZBH:

1.63

LMAT:

5.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZBH:

$7.70B

LMAT:

$226.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZBH:

$5.11B

LMAT:

$154.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZBH:

$1.79B

LMAT:

$65.12M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a -9.77% return, which is significantly higher than LMAT's -11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has underperformed LMAT with an annualized return of -0.63%, while LMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.11% annualized return.


ZBH

YTD

-9.77%

1M

-7.47%

6M

-12.11%

1Y

-20.60%

5Y*

-3.52%

10Y*

-0.63%

LMAT

YTD

-11.33%

1M

4.63%

6M

-19.04%

1Y

9.54%

5Y*

26.64%

10Y*

24.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZBH vs. LMAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZBH is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZBH is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZBH is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZBH is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZBH is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZBH is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LMAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMAT is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMAT is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMAT is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMAT is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMAT is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMAT is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZBH vs. LMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZBH Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the LMAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBH and LMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.80
0.28
ZBH
LMAT

Dividends

ZBH vs. LMAT - Dividend Comparison

ZBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than LMAT's 0.83% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
1.01%0.91%0.79%0.75%0.76%0.62%0.64%0.93%0.80%0.93%0.86%0.78%
LMAT
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
0.83%0.69%0.99%1.09%0.88%0.94%0.95%1.18%0.69%0.71%0.93%1.83%

Drawdowns

ZBH vs. LMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, smaller than the maximum LMAT drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and LMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-43.34%
-24.33%
ZBH
LMAT

Volatility

ZBH vs. LMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) is 14.50%, while LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that ZBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.50%
17.81%
ZBH
LMAT

Financials

ZBH vs. LMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.91B
59.87M
(ZBH) Total Revenue
(LMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZBH vs. LMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%62.0%64.0%66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%20212022202320242025
63.3%
69.2%
(ZBH) Gross Margin
(LMAT) Gross Margin
ZBH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.

LMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.42M and revenue of 59.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.2%.

ZBH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.90M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

LMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.63M and revenue of 59.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

ZBH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 182.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

LMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a net income of 11.01M and revenue of 59.87M, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.