PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZBH vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZBH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -1.90%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.


ZBH

1D
3.25%
1M
10.87%
6M
13.08%
YTD
8.43%
1Y
8.14%
3Y*
-7.58%
5Y*
-6.79%
10Y*
-1.90%
ALL TIME*
5.52%

VOO

1D
1.42%
1M
1.69%
6M
9.53%
YTD
11.72%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.17%
ALL TIME*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.97B$3.80B$5.49B
$207.83M$207.98M$201.59M

ZBH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
8.43%-14.03%-12.46%-3.81%4.24%-17.02%3.77%45.37%-13.30%17.86%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBH and VOO is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between ZBH and VOO has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZBH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZBH
ZBH Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBH Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBH Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZBH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZBHVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.33

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.63

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

11.23

-10.66

ZBH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBH Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBH and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZBH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZBHVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.03%

-33.99%

-31.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

-8.90%

-16.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-18.69%

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.94%

-24.52%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.14%

-33.99%

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.51%

0.00%

-41.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.22%

-3.67%

-16.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.18%

2.08%

+12.10%

Volatility

ZBH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that ZBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZBHVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

3.81%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

10.18%

+13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.62%

12.80%

+19.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

16.95%

+10.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.69%

18.02%

+10.67%

Dividends

ZBH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ZBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
0.99%1.07%0.91%0.79%0.75%0.76%0.62%0.64%0.93%0.80%0.93%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZBH and VOO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZBH has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBH dropped -65.03% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZBH and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer