ZBH vs. ^DVG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG).

Performance

ZBH vs. ^DVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZBH vs. ^DVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.	1.51%	-14.03%	-12.46%	-3.81%	4.24%	-17.02%	3.77%	45.37%	-13.30%	17.86%
^DVG NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index	-3.33%	12.45%	16.48%	11.94%	-11.28%	21.39%	13.47%	27.27%	-3.92%	19.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than ^DVG's -3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has underperformed ^DVG with an annualized return of -0.54%, while ^DVG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.

ZBH

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -8.25%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: -18.14%
• 3Y*: -10.21%
• 5Y*: -9.38%
• 10Y*: -0.54%

^DVG

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -3.33%
• 6M: -2.58%
• 1Y: 10.48%
• 3Y*: 11.89%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZBH vs. ^DVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBH

ZBH Risk / Return Rank: 15
ZBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ZBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ZBH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ZBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ZBH Martin Ratio Rank: 18

^DVG

^DVG Risk / Return Rank: 45
^DVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
^DVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
^DVG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
^DVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
^DVG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBH vs. ^DVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZBH	^DVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	0.67	-1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	1.07	-1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.15	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	1.08	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	4.63	-5.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZBH vs. ^DVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBH Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the ^DVG Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBH and ^DVG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZBH	^DVG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	0.67	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	0.54	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	0.63	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.38	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ZBH and ^DVG is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

ZBH vs. ^DVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, which is greater than ^DVG's maximum drawdown of -48.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and ^DVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZBH	^DVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.03%	-48.54%	-16.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.33%	-10.84%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.59%	-21.58%	-27.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.73%	-31.85%	-17.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.25%	-6.58%	-38.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.86%	-6.90%	-12.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.61%	2.52%	+13.09%

Volatility

ZBH vs. ^DVG - Volatility Comparison

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) at 4.26%. This indicates that ZBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^DVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZBH	^DVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.57%	4.26%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.33%	8.21%	+15.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.05%	15.86%	+15.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.05%	14.45%	+11.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.11%	16.25%	+11.86%