YINN vs. CNXT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YINN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YINN returned -19.13%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for CNXT. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.

Performance

YINN vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 32.68% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed CNXT with an annualized return of -19.13%, while CNXT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.57% annualized return.

YINN

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -10.06%
• YTD: -28.25%
• 6M: -32.42%
• 1Y: -20.61%
• 3Y*: -2.89%
• 5Y*: -38.69%
• 10Y*: -19.13%

CNXT

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 9.11%
• YTD: 32.68%
• 6M: 39.36%
• 1Y: 114.61%
• 3Y*: 26.75%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 6.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-28.25%	54.21%	36.06%	-53.08%	-71.97%	-58.56%	-7.75%	28.92%	-48.47%	129.79%
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	32.68%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and CNXT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014	0.58

The correlation between YINN and CNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

YINN vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YINN	CNXT
Financial Services	34.7%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	27.4%	1.2%
Communication Services	15.7%	2.5%
Energy	5.6%	-
Technology	5.5%	43.8%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.1%
Industrials	2.4%	33.2%
Healthcare	2.3%	7.0%
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	2.6%
Utilities	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

YINN vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 6
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YINN	CNXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	3.75	-4.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	4.40	-4.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.55	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	9.44	-9.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	28.91	-29.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YINN vs. CNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the CNXT Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and CNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YINN	CNXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	3.75	-4.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.41	0.11	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.23	0.21	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.22	-0.44

Drawdowns

YINN vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than CNXT's maximum drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and CNXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	YINN	CNXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.87%	-68.98%	-29.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.74%	-12.21%	-35.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.08%	-48.60%	-20.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.28%	-61.21%	-35.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.59%	-63.30%	-35.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.46%	-2.76%	-94.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.48%	-42.93%	-25.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.39%	3.98%	+20.41%

Volatility

YINN vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 21.19% compared to VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) at 10.30%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YINN	CNXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.19%	10.30%	+10.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.60%	19.99%	+22.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.73%	30.73%	+28.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.19%	35.26%	+58.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.78%	31.64%	+50.14%

YINN vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

YINN vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than CNXT's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.14%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.39%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YINN and CNXT in my portfolio?

YINN and CNXT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YINN or CNXT?

YINN has higher volatility (21.19%) compared to CNXT (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs CNXT's -68.98%.

Which ETF is better, YINN or CNXT?

On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 6.57% vs -19.13% for YINN. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CNXT has been the lower-risk option at 10.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YINN or CNXT?

Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 6.57% return vs -19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YINN or CNXT?

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YINN or CNXT?

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.14% for CNXT.

What is the main difference between YINN and CNXT?

YINN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CNXT is China Equities. YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.65% for CNXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.