PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YINN vs. CHAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YINN vs. CHAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -32.72% return, which is significantly lower than CHAU's 15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed CHAU with an annualized return of -18.61%, while CHAU has yielded a comparatively higher 5.11% annualized return.


YINN

1D
-4.76%
1M
-12.88%
YTD
-32.72%
6M
-31.32%
1Y
-29.80%
3Y*
-10.17%
5Y*
-38.49%
10Y*
-18.61%

CHAU

1D
-1.02%
1M
2.19%
YTD
15.97%
6M
23.87%
1Y
74.47%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
-8.13%
10Y*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. CHAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-32.72%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
15.97%47.73%6.61%-28.25%-49.17%-2.84%71.95%70.01%-51.03%74.91%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and CHAU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.73

The correlation between YINN and CHAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

YINN vs. CHAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YINN
CHAU

Financial Services

34.8%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

26.4%
6.4%

Communication Services

16.3%
0.8%

Technology

5.4%
31.1%

Energy

5.3%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
9.4%

Industrials

3.2%
16.1%

Healthcare

2.3%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
6.7%

Utilities

0.4%
3.1%

Financial Services

YINN
34.8%
CHAU
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

YINN
26.4%
CHAU
6.4%

Communication Services

YINN
16.3%
CHAU
0.8%

Technology

YINN
5.4%
CHAU
31.1%

Energy

YINN
5.3%
CHAU
2.5%

Basic Materials

YINN
3.9%
CHAU
9.4%

Industrials

YINN
3.2%
CHAU
16.1%

Healthcare

YINN
2.3%
CHAU
4.4%

Real Estate

YINN
1.1%
CHAU
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

YINN
0.9%
CHAU
6.7%

Utilities

YINN
0.4%
CHAU
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YINN vs. CHAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAU
CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. CHAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YINNCHAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.36

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

4.90

-5.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

13.85

-15.01

YINN vs. CHAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the CHAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and CHAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YINN vs. CHAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than CHAU's maximum drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and CHAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YINNCHAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.87%

-79.21%

-19.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.61%

-15.27%

-34.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.08%

-59.88%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-72.59%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-78.58%

-20.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.61%

-53.20%

-44.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.53%

-58.87%

-9.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.88%

5.39%

+20.49%

Volatility

YINN vs. CHAU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) at 11.83%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YINNCHAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.79%

11.83%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.78%

24.27%

+18.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.67%

34.41%

+24.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.21%

47.14%

+47.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.77%

47.19%

+34.58%

YINN vs. CHAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAU's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

YINN vs. CHAU - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than CHAU's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
1.75%1.97%2.25%3.97%0.77%1.73%0.09%0.58%0.83%0.00%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.48%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


YINN and CHAU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to CHAU (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs CHAU's -79.21%.

On 10-year performance, CHAU leads with 5.11% vs -18.61% for YINN. On fees, CHAU is cheaper at 1.21% per year. On volatility, CHAU has been the lower-risk option at 11.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CHAU has performed better with a 5.11% return vs -18.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHAU is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

CHAU has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.48% for YINN.

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 1.21% for CHAU.

CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YINN and CHAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer