YINN vs. KWEB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both China Equities funds - YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%) while KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YINN returned -19.14%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for KWEB. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

YINN vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -22.99% return, which is significantly lower than KWEB's -16.33% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed KWEB with an annualized return of -19.14%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.31% annualized return.

YINN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 47.06%
• 6M: -28.89%
• YTD: -22.99%
• 1Y: -18.90%
• 3Y*: -6.92%
• 5Y*: -31.78%
• 10Y*: -19.14%
• ALL TIME*: -16.75%

KWEB

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 14.01%
• 6M: -19.47%
• YTD: -16.33%
• 1Y: -12.39%
• 3Y*: 0.77%
• 5Y*: -7.53%
• 10Y*: 0.31%
• ALL TIME*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	$554.38M	$548.17M	$693.22M
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	$36.72M	$38.32M	$61.80M

YINN vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-22.99%	54.21%	36.06%	-53.08%	-71.97%	-58.56%	-7.75%	28.92%	-48.47%	129.79%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-16.33%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	58.23%	29.92%	-33.80%	69.73%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and KWEB is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013	0.81

The correlation between YINN and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YINN vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YINN	KWEB
Financial Services	35.2%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	25.3%	36.4%
Communication Services	17.8%	32.4%
Technology	5.9%	11.8%
Energy	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	-
Industrials	2.8%	4.5%
Healthcare	2.6%	6.0%
Real Estate	1.0%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	3.0%
Utilities	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

YINN vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 7
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YINN vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YINN	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	-0.53	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	-0.62	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.93	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	-0.35	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	-0.67	-0.04

YINN vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is comparable to the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YINN vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than KWEB's maximum drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	YINN	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.87%	-80.92%	-17.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.64%	-41.62%	-20.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.88%	-41.62%	-24.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.54%	-63.96%	-30.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.59%	-80.92%	-17.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.27%	-67.05%	-30.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.74%	-35.65%	-33.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.90%	21.98%	+9.92%

Volatility

YINN vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 15.13% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 7.76%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YINN	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.13%	7.76%	+7.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.51%	20.68%	+22.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.16%	27.82%	+32.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.51%	46.99%	+46.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.59%	40.04%	+41.55%

YINN vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

YINN vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than KWEB's 7.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.36%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.16%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YINN and KWEB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, YINN and KWEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, YINN or KWEB?

YINN has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to KWEB (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, YINN or KWEB?

On 10-year performance, KWEB leads with 0.31% vs -19.14% for YINN. On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YINN or KWEB?

Over the 10-year period, KWEB has performed better with a 0.31% return vs -19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YINN or KWEB?

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YINN or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 1.16% for YINN.

What is the main difference between YINN and KWEB?

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.