XSW vs. VUG
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 12.80%/yr vs 18.02%/yr for VUG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
XSW vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.80%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.02% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
VUG
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 18.02%
XSW vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -13.68% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 3.52% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and VUG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XSW and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSW vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
VUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSW
VUG
Financial Services
XSW
VUG
Communication Services
XSW
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
VUG
Healthcare
XSW
VUG
Industrials
XSW
VUG
Basic Materials
XSW
-
VUG
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
VUG
Energy
XSW
-
VUG
Real Estate
XSW
-
VUG
Utilities
XSW
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
VUG
XSW vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.21 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.22 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 4.15 | -4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -50.68% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -16.53% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -22.85% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -35.61% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -35.61% | -9.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -6.88% | -14.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -7.09% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 4.84% | +11.47% |
Volatility
XSW vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 6.86%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 6.86% | +4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 13.44% | +10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 16.91% | +11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 22.39% | +6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 21.51% | +4.75% |
XSW vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and VUG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to VUG (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.02% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer