XSMO vs. TMFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS).
XSMO and TMFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. TMFS is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Oct 29, 2018.
Performance
XSMO vs. TMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSMO vs. TMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 7.05% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -9.95% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | -7.68% | -1.59% | 15.41% | 25.40% | -33.15% | -2.38% | 58.52% | 40.19% | -8.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than TMFS's -7.68% return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
TMFS
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- -7.68%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- -2.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSMO vs. TMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. TMFS — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
TMFS
XSMO vs. TMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSMO | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | -0.05 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 0.10 | +1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.01 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.05 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | -0.16 | +7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSMO | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | -0.05 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.13 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.31 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and TMFS is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XSMO vs. TMFS - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. TMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than TMFS's maximum drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and TMFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -48.79% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -15.73% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -45.68% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.59% | -25.20% | +20.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -19.45% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 5.33% | -2.09% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. TMFS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) at 6.93%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 6.93% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 14.49% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.11% | 24.45% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 22.95% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 25.64% | -1.59% |