XSMO vs. SLYG
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.24%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
XSMO vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 21.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 15.24%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
SLYG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 17.84%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
XSMO vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.23% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 21.33% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and SLYG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XSMO and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMO vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
SLYG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
XSMO
SLYG
Industrials
XSMO
SLYG
Healthcare
XSMO
SLYG
Financial Services
XSMO
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
SLYG
Basic Materials
XSMO
SLYG
Real Estate
XSMO
SLYG
Communication Services
XSMO
SLYG
Utilities
XSMO
SLYG
Energy
XSMO
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
SLYG
XSMO vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 3.50 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | 12.32 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -62.92% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -9.10% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -27.39% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -29.18% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -41.86% | +2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.45% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -14.88% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.58% | +0.05% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.27%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 5.27% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 12.98% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 17.94% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 21.56% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 22.74% | +1.39% |
XSMO vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SLYG's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.67% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.53% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XSMO and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to SLYG (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.24% vs 11.70% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.24% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.53% for XSMO.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.15% for SLYG.
SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer