PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. SLYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 21.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 15.24%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.


XSMO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.78%
YTD
24.23%
6M
20.02%
1Y
34.26%
3Y*
25.28%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
15.24%

SLYG

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.52%
YTD
21.33%
6M
17.84%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
24.23%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
21.33%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and SLYG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.90

The correlation between XSMO and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSMO vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMO
SLYG

Technology

22.1%
19.9%

Industrials

18.7%
18.9%

Healthcare

14.3%
15.1%

Financial Services

12.2%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
11.0%

Basic Materials

6.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

4.9%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.5%
2.9%

Utilities

3.5%
1.8%

Energy

2.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.0%

Technology

XSMO
22.1%
SLYG
19.9%

Industrials

XSMO
18.7%
SLYG
18.9%

Healthcare

XSMO
14.3%
SLYG
15.1%

Financial Services

XSMO
12.2%
SLYG
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMO
8.6%
SLYG
11.0%

Basic Materials

XSMO
6.0%
SLYG
2.8%

Real Estate

XSMO
4.9%
SLYG
6.3%

Communication Services

XSMO
4.5%
SLYG
2.9%

Utilities

XSMO
3.5%
SLYG
1.8%

Energy

XSMO
2.9%
SLYG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

XSMO
2.4%
SLYG
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSMOSLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.50

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

12.32

+0.75

XSMO vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and SLYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and SLYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOSLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-62.92%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.10%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-27.39%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-29.18%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-41.86%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.45%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-14.88%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.58%

+0.05%

Volatility

XSMO vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.27%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOSLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

5.27%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

12.98%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

17.94%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

21.56%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

22.74%

+1.39%

XSMO vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMO vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SLYG's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.67%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.53%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XSMO and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSMO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to SLYG (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs SLYG's -62.92%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.24% vs 11.70% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.24% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.

SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.53% for XSMO.

XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.15% for SLYG.

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and SLYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer