PortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. FCPVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and FCPVX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XSMO vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XSMO:

0.42

FCPVX:

0.14

Sortino Ratio

XSMO:

0.81

FCPVX:

0.38

Omega Ratio

XSMO:

1.10

FCPVX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

XSMO:

0.45

FCPVX:

0.14

Martin Ratio

XSMO:

1.24

FCPVX:

0.43

Ulcer Index

XSMO:

8.87%

FCPVX:

7.94%

Daily Std Dev

XSMO:

25.28%

FCPVX:

23.46%

Max Drawdown

XSMO:

-58.07%

FCPVX:

-57.57%

Current Drawdown

XSMO:

-8.76%

FCPVX:

-8.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than FCPVX's -1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed FCPVX with an annualized return of 10.86%, while FCPVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.


XSMO

YTD

1.49%

1M

13.34%

6M

-4.32%

1Y

10.68%

5Y*

16.07%

10Y*

10.86%

FCPVX

YTD

-1.62%

1M

12.78%

6M

-4.12%

1Y

3.10%

5Y*

18.14%

10Y*

8.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSMO vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XSMO vs. FCPVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XSMO is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XSMO is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XSMO is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XSMO is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XSMO is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XSMO is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCPVX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XSMO vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and FCPVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

XSMO vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FCPVX's 6.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.82%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.65%0.28%0.30%0.35%1.31%
FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
6.24%6.13%5.20%5.92%7.95%0.46%3.49%36.93%3.64%7.12%12.28%12.65%

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and FCPVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XSMO vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is 5.75%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that XSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...